• Mapotakes API (talk · contribs)
  • Zm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Zm (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mapotakes API (talk) 00:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mesbahfarag (talk · contribs)
  • User:Mesbahfarag/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mesbahfarag (talk) 07:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to publish an article about my company profile with all data. this request had been rejected around 3 times every time i find a missing info from m,y side, yet the last time I upload the article also had been rejected please let me know ASAP what should i do and if you have any tutorial videos about how to create an article and publish it share it with me.

Mesbahfarag please see WP:PAID Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 18:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - Partial admission to using multiple accounts and creating the drafts for employer.--CNMall41 (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 2600:1700:F920:8E0:6D49:4813:2405:FF6E (talk · contribs)
  • User:1C10wn w0rmz1/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is for my Roblox myth I really need it to grow!! please. 2600:1700:F920:8E0:6D49:4813:2405:FF6E (talk) 07:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a self-promotion tool. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sk Wasim Akram 13 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mukul Gain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This article have enough notation, he is an Music Artist, Youtuber with over 1 milliion subscriber and also we saw him in various reality show as a dancer. Link from TimesOfIndia News Website: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/tv/hindi/indias-best-dancer-finalist-mukul-gain-on-his-journey-competition-and-more/videoshow/79324478.cms

Sk Wasim Akram 13 (talk) 08:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sk Wasim Akram 13 I reviewed it. I also note the image on Commons has debatable licencing.

Are you in any way associated with Mukul Gain? Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NO 27.122.61.40 (talk) 12:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sk Wasim Akram 13 the draft also has bad grammar, spelling errors, and lots of unsourced statements. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 08:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me to resolve the errors please. 27.122.61.40 (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Shadysbook (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Oasis Fertility (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Help us to take this live. Any other information that might help us to take this live

Shadysbook (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shadysbook Who is "us"? If you represent or work for Oasis Fertility, that must be declared per the Terms of Use, see WP:PAID. Only a single person should be operating your account.

Please see my reply from February 27 above. The draft will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• MooseMelon (talk · contribs)
  • User talk:Krismas (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Why was the draft page "Krismas" denied????????????? I would like to know changes i cold make so i can improve my draft! Thank You!!! MooseMelon (talk) 14:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MooseMelon No improvement is possible, that is what rejected means. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about something. Please see the five pillars and Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Llouest (talk · contribs)
  • William Samuel Horton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:William Samuel Horton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Question: Hi, why my draft on the American impressionist painter 'William Samuel Horton' (Draft:William Samuel Horton), started on November 21, and progressively perfected in the meantime, is still not approved? The reviewer, nicknamed 'Hoary', had initially commented that there are not enough serious references, which is odd as I included in my draft many more official references on this artist's life and work that what there has been in the Wikipedia French article on this person (to which I also added myself some missing references) which has been published on the French Wikipedia for over two years. Please advise, Regards, Llouest Llouest (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• MooseMelon (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Krismas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

We changed around a couple of things to make it seem more Wikipedia-like. We tried to clean it up and hope you will re-review it.

MooseMelon (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MooseMelon: please see the response to your previous inquiry, it already said no amount of editing can the make subject notable. The only thing that could make it notable for Wikipedia is reliable sources talking about it in published media. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• KenKaneki1803 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tryst - IIT Delhi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I just submitted a descriptive article named "Tryst - IIT Delhi" from my account "KenKaneki1803". Earlier the article submitted by my subordinate was deleted several times, due to the reasons that I am yet to figure. Now when I myself tried to submit the content after making suitable changes, the reviewer thinks that I am the same person creating multiple accounts. I want you to know that I am a different individual, and henceforth request you to please assist me in making this submission possible.

KenKaneki1803 (talk) 16:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KenKaneki1803 We have no interest in anything you or your subordinates wish to say about what appears to be your company or employer. That is against the purpose of Wikipedia. We care only about what is recorded in independent reliable sources.

You appear to be blocked as a Sockpuppet. You are also a WP:PAID editor. This is an amateur project. Paid editors need to behave much better than this. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Dougwill2 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Joseph Archibald Williams (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Preparing article about American inventor with 31 patents from 1899 - 1930, listed in table with #, Pub date, Title, Applicant, Inventor(s). Should I link patent #'s to USPTO database (scanned images and text of original patent) or Google patent database (scanned images and searchable text); or both?

Dougwill2 (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dougwill2 Neither. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state; government documents/records are considered primary sources. The article should only summarize what those independent sources say. 331dot (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• SteveJClay (talk · contribs)
  • User:SteveJClay/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I require help with my article. can some please help me?

SteveJClay (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Dougwill2 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Joseph Archibald Williams (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per prior inquiry re patent links: the noted patent table IS a summary table, following a fully-referenced bio article. If a reader wishes to see details of a particular patent doc it is easier to have a ready link available than none. But your comment is useful, as it states Wiki ranks gov sources like USPTO over Google, even tho Google's searchable text may have more utility. Thx.

Dougwill2 (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dougwill2: Both of them are useless - We treat government documents as primary sources, and in almost all circumstances Google and other search engines cannot provide enough detail to cite. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 21:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Bocarlson10 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Global Americans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, 9 months ago I created a draft article for an organization, Global Americans. To comply with the notability guidelines, I included a few independent, secondary, reliable sources, but the article was rejected for a lack of independent sources. I've now added several more independent, secondary, and reliable sources with significant coverage. These include a staff-written article in Forbes, which is recognized as a reliable source in the perennial sources list. Most of the references are from Spanish-language media, so they are not yet on the perennial sources list. These include Milenio, Las 2 Orillas, Voice of America, Perfil, and El Financiero—a Mexican periodical whose partner company, Bloomberg, is on the perennial sources list. Would you let me know if these sources will qualify the article for publication? If not, please let me know what other edits I should make! Thank you.

Bocarlson10 (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bocarlson10: Please refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:

• https://theglobalamericans.org/about-us/ is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Anything written by or on behalf of the subject or their surrogates/principals is useless for notability.
• https://www.cfr.org/blog/latin-america-goes-global-launch is useless for notability (No editorial oversight). "Blog posts represent the views of [Council on Foreign Relations'] fellows and staff and not those of CFR, which takes no institutional positions." In other words, this is an op-ed.
• https://www.elimpulso.com/2020/05/21/pulsoempresarial-global-americans-da-la-bienvenida-a-guy-mentel-como-nuevo-director-ejecutivo/ is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Op-ed from the organisation's director.
• https://www.ccacanada.com/resources/podcasts/ is 404-compliant.
• https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/tech/2021/10/21/fake-news-se-detendran-solo-con-union-de-instituciones-gobierno-y-sociedad-guy-mentel/ is useless for notability (too sparse). A supermajority of the article is direct quotes from, or claims attributed to, the organisation's director.
• https://www.las2orillas.co/la-desinformacion-y-la-propaganda-politica-que-viene-del-extranjero/ is useless for notability (no editorial oversight). "Este es un espacio de expresión libre e independiente que refleja exclusivamente los puntos de vista de los autores y no compromete el pensamiento ni la opinión de Las2Orillas." Or, translated roughly, "This article represents the views of the author and has not been vetted by Las2Orillas."
• https://www.vozdeamerica.com/a/desinformacion-agrava-riesgo-democracias-america-latina/6247778.html is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop.
• https://www.milenio.com/tecnologia/campanas-desinformacion-refuerzan-influencia-politica-guy-mentel is useless for notability (too sparse). The entire article is quotes from or claims attributed to the director.
• https://forbes.co/2021/10/22/tecnologia/desinformacion-y-fake-news-reflejo-de-fallas-sociales-preexistentes-guy-mentel/ is useless for notability (too sparse). While there is some information here about a study Global Americans published, there's nothing else about the organisation itself.
• https://www.perfil.com/noticias/internacional/fake-news-hay-que-ser-escepticos-con-los-medios-estatales-de-paises-no-democraticos.phtml is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Interview with director.
• We can't use https://www.guidestar.org/profile/47-3979681 (too sparse). Profile sites are generally too sparse to cite at the best of times.
• https://theglobalamericans.org/our-research/ is useless for notability (connexion to subject).

I don't see any of the non-routine, in-depth independent coverage with competent editorial oversight and identifiable authors that we're looking for. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 21:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jéské Couriano: Thank you for the detailed and prompt reply, Jéské! I will hold off on resubmitting the article for publication. If other, reliable sources publish significant coverage on the organization in the coming months to establish notability, I will edit and resubmit.