Draft:Da_Vinci_(magazine) WillsEdtior777 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Cyuppyworld (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Oakwood (Hospitality) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

09:29:52, 1 March 2022 review of submission by Cyuppyworld

• Cyuppyworld (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

May I know how can I improve this article to make it publish? I have made disclose as well. Thank you.

Cyuppyworld (talk) 09:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the propper code allowing you to submit the draft for review, however, submitting the draft at this time would be a waste of time as it would not be accepted. Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. Please see MOS:WORDS. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 183.83.161.112 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Murali Mohan Kasthala (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

183.83.161.112 (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Murali MohanKasthala (born on 11 September 1996) is an Indian cinematographer primarily known for his work in the Telugu film industry. He began his career with assistant cinematographer with Om Namo Venkatesaya (2017) under the cinematographer of S Gopal Reddy And continued as associate cinematographer for Anando Brahma (2017) under the cinematographer of Anish Tharunkumar And worked as associate cinematographer for Rangasthalam(2018) under the cinematographer of R Ratnavelu and worked as associate cinematographer for Arjun Suravaram(2019)under the cinematographer of Surya. And as a cinematographer he completed Gentleman (2020 film) under the direction of Jadesh Kumar Hampi and going on with Model Telugu film (2021) as cinematographer under the direction of Murali K maddirala

Totally unsourced and rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 18:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sachitj (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Devendra Khandelwal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear editors, it is not possible to understand clearly what you expect me to improve in my page, I have provided two references from reliable news papers, If I am not doing in the right way, kindly please do it yourself. Requesting you to make it easy to understand for common people to follow easy steps and make Wikipedia more rich of information. Thanks!!

Sachitj (talk) 14:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are two sources in Draft:Devendra Khandelwal. One of them mentions that he is the chairman of the IIMC, and the other one says that he has shot eighteen documentaries about Mahatma Gandhi, and that he has been a judge for the National Award and the Screen Film Awards. But the draft contains a lot more information, about things like his education, his date of birth, his production company, and so on. Where does that information come from? A biographical article about a living person has particularly strong requirements for sourcing – as you were told last time you asked about this draft. Sources need to be independent, secondary, and provide in-depth coverage of the person (not just a mention of his name). And in addition, the draft is still very promotionally written, so it would not be accepted for that reason, either. --bonadea contributions talk 17:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Snehil4 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tryst IITD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have tried creating this page for 5-6 times and every time it gets rejected or deleted. I am not able to understand the problem here so please help me out here. My college (IIT Delhi) is organizing a technical fest and I am given the job to create a wiki page for the fest but I am not able to do so. Snehil4 (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A university fest or gathering is most likely not going to be notable enough to justify an encyclopedia article. ValarianB (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sanskriti88 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Pericent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please advise whether the article is natural and is notable as per coverage in secondary source for this thought leadership on the real situation! Sanskriti88 (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was rejected as blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage language like "breakthrough company" "disrupted itself" "thought leadership company" "solid foundation of digital transformation" "bringing disruption" and "helping to well-known global companies" mean you're writing an advertisement, and one apparently aimed at corporate morons who are drawn to buzzwords as flies are drawn to fresh excrement. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 2001:56A:7780:8000:DC7A:F87F:CA61:5CCA (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

2001:56A:7780:8000:DC7A:F87F:CA61:5CCA (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC) my thing was declined :(([reply]

Unless you can link to the draft in question we can't offer any advice. We're not psychic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 21:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]