• Spacemud1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bodiggles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I apologize for the inconvenience but my article about the youtuber "bodiggles" was declined, and I need some clarification of what i need to change/do so it is acceptable. Thank you for your time.

Spacemud1 (talk) 01:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No sources, no article, no debate. We cannot accept "I know <foo> personally" as a source - What should happen if you should become an amnesiac, become incommunicado, or die, and how can we be sure you aren't lying for his benefit? Published third-party sources are a hard requirement on Wikipedia. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 02:33, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spacemud1: (re-signing for ping) —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 02:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Parthyadav51 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Parth Yadav (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Parthyadav51 (talk) 07:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Abodiiyi (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:مطاعم ليمونه (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

i just wanted to know if the draft is ready to be submitted for a review or i have to wait to get Autoconfirmed access first then submit of a review?

Abodiiyi (talk) 08:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Abodiiyi: No, you don't need to be autoconfirmed in order to submit a draft for review, however, if this draft were to be submitted in its current state, it would almost certainly denied. Wikipedia is not for promotion of any kind, however noble your cause might be. Please review MOS:PEACOCK. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you assistance is very appreciated. however my submission got rejected because lack of notability, from my point of view i can see that making a lot of explanation would lead to unfortunate Promotional materials so that is why i had to give a brief description of the company and its locations, website, number, field of business, official logo and finally some references that are being reliable enough to get this article approved, please make sure that you have read the article carefully after i have made some changes. you understanding is highly appreciated as i have spent 8 days trying to put this on Wikipedia as it is a huge step for me.

Abodiiyi (talk) 11:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abodiiyi For additional comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. This is easier to do in full desktop mode, the app and mobile versions do not have full functionality. 331dot (talk) 13:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. If you are associated with this company, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 13:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Lèo KVPS (talk · contribs)

Hi, my draft has just been rejected by you and I really want to know the detailed reasons and also hope to receive some suggestions or advice. I guess I should mention some articles/ newspapers or other sources so you can get more information about this boy group, right? Thanks in advance. Lèo KVPS (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. Press releases, blogs, bands own website are not acceptable sources to determine notability. You need independent, in-depth coverage by reliable sources. Slywriter (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Saidzouhdi (talk · contribs)

• Saidzouhdi (talk · contribs)

Hi, I created this page about a scientific journal. Your comments to improve it are most welcome! Thank you! @saidzouhdi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saidzouhdi (talk • contribs) 18:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Saidzouhdi: I added the template so you can submit your draft review. S0091 (talk) 20:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: Thank you! the article was submitted and declined. The reason was: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia."

Could you please explain to me what "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" means? should I add more references? what kind of references (the article is about a scientific journal)? I saw that some of the journals referenced by wikipedia have cited only one reference. Thank you your help!

• 37.186.32.254 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Taskin Ahmed Riyadh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

37.186.32.254 (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Xfix (talk · contribs)
  • Scott the Woz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Scott the Woz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Since last rejection, article changed to focus on "Scott the Woz" web series rather than its author, and article got additional secondary sources. Xfix (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article was rejected so it will not longer be considered. Also, IMDB is not a reliable source so should not be used. S0091 (talk) 20:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Xfix:. S0091 (talk) 20:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]