• Sjchin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Akribis Systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

}} Asking for this page - Draft:Akribis_Systems https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Akribis_Systems #cite_note-2 Wanted to ask if this link can be used as a source? https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/becoming-global-hub/connecting-world-2277481 This is a part of the docuseries done by Channel News Asia. Our part starts at 28:00. Sjchin (talk) 00:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• StrategyLady (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:James Jerome Carter Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

StrategyLady (talk) 04:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Rajeshrajesh2345 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ranjith Kumar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Rajeshrajesh2345 (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeshrajesh2345 You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone; please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Bobbiecompulsory (talk · contribs)

I am trying to make a page regarding a short film, I have included over 50 citations from reputable sources including film festival websites, reviewers and news websites. I have added links and credited all statements within the article. In order to highlight that what I was stating about the film's synopsis was indeed correct I cited the film's website which would additionally support that information. This page was by no means to promote but to highlight the cast, crew and festival accolades of the film, which were all supported by related links and sources.

However this is what I received with my rejection:

Besides notability concerns, you can not just lift content from the webpage of the movie and transfer it to wikipedia. we are not here to promote a product and truly care very little what a subject has to say about themselves

Bobbiecompulsory (talk) 10:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bobbiecompulsory The draft was deleted as a copyright infringement; if you lifted content like the syopsis from the film website, that would indeed be a copyright violation. "Highlight the cast, crew and festival accolades of the film" is indeed a promotional purpose. Wikipedia is only interested in summarizing what independent reliable sources have chosen on their own to say about(in this case) a film, not based on any materials put out by those associated with the film(such as interviews with staff/cast, press releases, basic announcements), showing how the film meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable film. If you are associated with this film, please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the synopsis, the biographies of the cast were word for word copyright violations. This plus the overly promotional tone of the article left no discretion when reviewing. Slywriter (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 2601:646:4300:3050:CD09:2F86:5158:F8CF (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Stan Polinkovsky (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please delete the following draft wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Stan_Polinkovsky

I created this on accident.

Thank you! 2601:646:4300:3050:CD09:2F86:5158:F8CF (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 27.59.83.184 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ajay Shetty (Entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

27.59.83.184 (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide actual independent sources. Interviews, blogs and re-printed press releases do not establish notabilty. Slywriter (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]