Language desk | ||
---|---|---|
< June 4 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 6 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
May I ask what exactly the defining distinction(s) between waraji and zōri would be? What is a hanao: short tween-toe loop, long vamp loop, or both? Are there terms for each of these loops, or other parts of the waraji? I've re-written the waraji article (reviews welcome), and it would be useful to know. Thanks! HLHJ (talk) 20:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Found another source, a museum shot with a sign titled "Waraji and zōri". They don't seem to expect visitors to know the kanji. Can anyone read this sign? It's a bit blurry. HLHJ (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
OK, I seem to belatedly have found a solid-looking source for this. "Waraji sandals are made of woven straw. Long straw straps attached to the front pass through loops on the sides and heel, and are tied around the ankle to fasten the sole to the foot...The straw zori is an improved version of the waraji, and is said to be the ancestor of the beach sandal now worn around the world. It has a thong and an oval sole, both made of woven straw. The big and second toes grip the shaft of the thong."[2]
The more-reliable sources, Japanese and Brit, seem to go with this strap-type distinction. However, starting in the Edo there has also been a distinction in materials, as waraji became rare and stayed with the trad materials while zōri innovated wildly (from source). They are now made of elastomers, vinyl, plastics, etc.. So I think some people now call any straw sandal "waraji", and any sandal "zōri", but the experts don't. Just for certainty, I've only used illustrations of zōri as zōri if the uploader called them zōri and they have a thong, and accordingly for waraji. I hope this will keep me from excessively stupid error. HLHJ (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
References
The simplest form of outdoor footwear is the waraji, a sandal of coarse rice-straw, some what shorter than the foot, to which it is firmly tied by means of two straw laces (often covered with white paper). These laces issue from between the first and second toes and pass in turn through a couple of loops at each side, up over the foot, through the loop which forms a heel-piece, and back again to be tied over the instep. The waraji are used by men for energetic and long-continued work, travelling, etc. Their length of life is only about twenty-four hours, but they are very cheap (about a farthing a pair) and supplies of them are carried by travellers and thrown away when worn out...(note the work is in the public domain, therefore the text is not copyright)
For ordinary use, such as leisurely walking on hard, dry ground, the zōri is employed. This is a sandal of fine rice-straw matting and normally has no separate sole. But varieties of it, made of woven rushes of various kinds or of bamboo-sheath, are commonly soled with coiled hemp-rope (asaura-zōri), with wistaria-stems, (fujiura-zōri), or with wood in lateral sections (zōri-geta or itatsuke-zōri). A superior variety, known as setta, has a raw-hide sole with (sic) iron heel-piece.
The zōri is kept on by means of two thick soft cords (hanao) of twisted cotton or paper, covered with leather or cloth, issuing from each side near the heel and uniting with a short, thinner piece which passes between, and is gripped by, the first and second toes. Rush zōri with very thick tapering cords of straw-rope covered with white paper or cotton are known as fuku-zōri. In modern times the hanao do not come so far back as in former days; the sandal itself is also a little shorter, instead of being slightly longer, than the foot
{{cite journal}}
: |volume=
has extra text (help)
Context: In Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great, the following quote appears: "hence articles like fuck which are essentially dictionaryshut up, Beavis articles". I'm particularly confused by the fact that this links to throat-clear; Beavis definitely exists and there are passages online about telling him to shut up, but I don't see the connection. Could someone explain what it means in context? (I think this might be an obscure cultural reference, but I wouldn't know about it.) Duckmather (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)