The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep if we can find some more. I was the one who created the category. I think if I can find another 3 directors then the category should be kept. If not, I'll probably go along with merge proposal. Thanks Karl Twist (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. As a rule, film directors are not defined by where they were born or raised as kids, but by where they do the work of directing films as adults. So "film directors from city" should only exist for major cities which can actually claim to be some type of filmmaking centre in their own right (e.g. New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Toronto, London, etc.), and not for every place with no film industry to speak of that has merely had two or more film directors grow up in it before moving to actually work as film directors in the big city. And since the substantive point of distinction in this tree is "works in this city's film industry" rather than "grew up inside this city's physical city limits", both people here could reasonably also be transferred to Category:Film directors from Los Angeles instead (Glendale being a suburb of Los Angeles anyway.) Bearcat (talk) 15:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. Whilst I have no objection to the category being renamed, I wonder whether the whole category tree Songs about XXX isn't weak naming and causing problems with the drive-by adding to cats on the strength of a word occurring in the title. Noting that there is no real harmonisation of titling, perhaps something along the lines of Teen-themed songs and similar might be beneficial? --Richhoncho (talk) 09:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:General Secretaries of British trade unions
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: A speedy rename was opposed on the spurious grounds that the current title was consistent with other categories in Category:General secretaries. However, what the opposers do not seem to have understood is that this is a generic container category, whereas the other categories refer to specific posts. Specific titles may be capitalised; generic titles are not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, e.g. "General Secretary of the Amalgamated Association of Card and Blowing Room Operatives" is a proper title, but "general secretary" is not. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge the other way, or to "folk costumes". The number of countries that actually have an official "National costume" is rather small. Johnbod (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is not, as it might seem at first, a category for songs by a band called La (or even The La's) -- it is a category for, and I'm quoting the usage note verbatim here, "Songs that go 'La La La'." As always, however, Wikipedia is not The Book of Lists, and our category system is not a free "make lists of anything you want to make a list of" space -- we categorize songs on their WP:DEFINING characteristics, not on every individual word their lyrics happen to share with other songs' lyrics. Never mind that probably at least 25 per cent of all songs ever recorded go "la la la" somewhere -- unsustainable much? -- but our la fan cherrypicked just three of them. Bearcat (talk) 08:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because a lot of these songs are known for their La's, so the La's define them. Thus they are La Songs. And people who have the La La's stuck in their head may want to look at the category to find the song. And add the Smurf song. Bod (talk) 02:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Songs are not defined by words present in their lyrics; they are defined by criteria such as the artist who performed them and the year they were released. And the Smurfs theme song doesn't have (and would never even qualify to have) its own standalone article to add here either — the link LaundryPizza added is to the show itself, not an article about its theme song. Bearcat (talk) 16:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Categorizing songs by the words, phrases, or noises they contain is a really bad idea. Moreover, along the lines that Bearcat asserts: songs are rarely, if ever, defined by the words they contain - especially so to meaningless refrain syllables - are "la songs" inherently defined, and defined differently than "fa songs" or "sha songs" or "na songs"? What reliable source tells us so? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.