The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT for just two shows, both of which are up for deletion at WP:AFD for not being properly sourceable as passing WP:TVSHOW criteria for notability. Even if one or both of them somehow gets kept, however, this still isn't particularly useful as a category for them: one of the two shows is already filed in both this and the target category anyway, because it was already airing on both Access and CTV Two even before Access got folded into CTV Two, and the one that was actually unique to Access wouldn't need to be categorized this narrowly on its own. This made sense at the time it was first created, when Access was still a separate thing and more of its shows had articles than this, but most of the articles have since been deleted and Access has since been rebranded as part of CTV Two, so there's no real need for this anymore. Bearcat (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Dual merge, it seems inconsistent that we require as many as 60 stubs to start a category but leave the category alone when they contain merely a handful of stubs. However if merged it should also be merged to the Capeverdian sport stubs. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge both to Category:Folk costumes. (For the record, I am also manually merging the corresponding categories in Urdu Wikipedia, which may have been copied from here and are poorly populated. However, Finnish and Vietnamese have both "traditional" and "national" categories, so I am not merging the Wikidata entries.) – FayenaticLondon09:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the other way, or to "folk costumes". The number of countries that actually have an official "National costume" is rather small. Johnbod (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.