Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Android Mouse Bot req2 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Android_Mouse_Bot_req2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: Android Mouse

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): C

Function Summary: It will tag article talk pages in Category:Rugby league players if they don't have an infobox.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run

Edit rate requested: 5 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: It will scan all articles in Category:Rugby league players and find those that don't have an infobox. For those that it finds, it will check and see if the {{WikiProject Rugby league}} has the parameter needs-infobox=yes. If it doesn't it will add that parameter and autotemplate=yes.

This bot no longer peforms the previous task it was assigned, so this account is unused at the moment. Also, since I have a bot named Android Mouse Bot 2 I couldn't use the standard syntax with this request since that page exists, hence the 'req' before the 2 in the page name. --Android Mouse 19:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —METS501 (talk) 20:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~50 edits done. Sorry, I completely forgot about setting the delay so it hammered the server for a few mintues until I saw what was going on. {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}}--Android Mouse 20:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It tagged 2 articles that had Infobox_Rugby_biography. Since this is almost the same as Infobox_rugby_league_biography, I'll have it skip pages that have either. --Android Mouse 20:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.  Approved. —METS501 (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.