Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Python IDE Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eric_Python_IDE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. This didn't need to be relisted. Joe Chill (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Python IDE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ keep ~~(for now)~~. Well-known Python IDE, mentioned in a a lot of books. Will look for something in-depth. Pcap ping 21:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A lot of those are false positives because of Eric Idle jokes, but this German book has one page on it. YMMV. Pcap ping 22:00, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Linux Journal review. Pcap ping 22:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Linux.com community blog review [1]. Python IDE comparison [2] (Eric is authors preference). --Fredrik Orderud (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as multiple independent sources have been listed. --Karnesky (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Handschuh-^{talk to me} 09:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.