Talk:Eric Python IDE Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eric_Python_IDE

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 December 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article is currently not consistent - should it be "eric" or "Eric"? --Mortense (talk) 14:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Officially it (seems to be) "eric". ... Except perhaps at the start of a sentence. nope that's not it. Plenty of sentences starting with lowercase "eric".

Change it on the gallery text. Ref-text cases use the same eric-case as is used in the linked page (which should not be changed I think). Not sure about the "Eric alludes to Eric Idle," part, so leaving that one as is. --MvGulik (talk) 11:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any need, or good reason(s), to maintain the version history table. For one the program is updated on a regular monthly base (with mixed minor/major changes per update). Two; for the new versioning scheme part its mainly becoming a list of (predictable) version numbers (and predictable dates) without any significant version changes info. Three; The Eric-ide website can be checked for related version changes (blindly copying them to here makes no real sense to me). The only version table that makes a bit of sense to me would be one that is condensed to only the major/significant changes. (four; think the lack of a regular page maintainer could also be included as a reason to simplify that table.) ... Reversing the data/fields could be used to just list its major features, followed by the related version. Making for a more easier, and less needy, to maintain table/data (I think). MvGulik (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]