Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boo (programming language) (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boo_(programming_language)_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No one, even the nominator, is arguing for deletion. Courcelles 00:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boo (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously nominated by banned user Flylanguage (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and I closed the discussion as a contribution by a banned user. Per the discussion here, I am re-nominating it without preference. causa sui (talk) 16:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, substantial coverage in reliable sources: [1], [2]. First is a published book, second is blog of recognized authority. TJRC (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: as TJRC points out there are plenty of sources for this, it's a well-known language in the .NET world and Google Books gives you a few good sources. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If you google, there a many mentions of this language. The problem is simply that the article doesn't reference them. snaphat ► 02:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.