Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boo (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boo_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Vacated. Does not appear to be a good faith nomination causa sui (talk) 03:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boo (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy delete clearly a toy project with no notable refences. The only reference is by the developer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs)

• Note - This AFD was malformed. There was no listing in the AFD list for July 26. I have added it. The AFD discussion did not have the standard AFD template material. I have added it in. Note that the nominator is the author of Fly (programming language) which is under consideration for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly (programming language). -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Comment Yup, all programming language entries with no notable references should apparently be removed, so here goes... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 16:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If you google, there a many mentions of this language. The problem is simply that the article doesn't reference them. snaphat (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doesn't matter, since there's not notable reference. Your keep is obviously Keep just because you have issues with me. - FlyLanguage
    • It does matter. Simply because the article doesn't reference things, doesn't make the subject not notable, just a poor article. I don't have issue with you, I actually voted weak-delete on another article you nominated for AfD. And, if you'd fix the malformed AFDs for the other stuff you nominated, I would score accordingly (as I agree with you in some of the cases). snaphat (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 21:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Of our multitude of articles on minor and really non-notable languages, Boo is one of the few that does have some notice taken of it outside of its own developers.

I'd also note the WP:POINTY behaviour of the nominator here, just because their own pet project, Fly, looks likely to not survive an AfD. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Not relevant. The Boo article doesn't meet notability requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 20:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.