Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic particle Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Basic_particle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basic particle

Neologism. I think it was invented in connection with the (currently AFD) Basic-particle_formation_scheme but it is absolutely not a meaningful category in mainstream particle physics. Bm gub 14:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell if it's WP:OR or WP:NFT but it sure isn't the particle physics I learned. Delete. Alba 14:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologism. The author might be thinking of fundamental particles that you find in particle physics.Operating 15:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be a confusion about the concept "elementary particle". No sources, and guess why. (By the way, I wonder what the author would call a neutron.) --B. Wolterding 18:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- only one author sourced. Need evidence that it's becoming accepted.--SarekOfVulcan 01:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As opposed to acidic particle? shoy 02:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. —Pete.Hurd 07:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As with the article on the theory, this would appear to be just one guy's idea. This has also existed on the Wiki for a scary amount of time. Someguy1221 08:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Same rationale as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic-particle formation scheme. All non-notable OR. • Lawrence Cohen 13:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.