Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic-particle formation scheme Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Basic-particle_formation_scheme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basic-particle formation scheme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

OR, uncited, non-peer-reviewed theory Bm gub 05:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Original thought. All referenced papers are by the same two authors. --Alksub 06:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - OR & COI as the article is written by User:Jxzj, who is the co-author of the references used in the article. No outside sources to back up the self references used to cite the article. Spawn Man 07:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• NOTE: I've also AFD'ed the apparently-related neologism Basic particle.Bm gub 14:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. —Pete.Hurd 07:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The given references certainly give this theory the appearance of one guy's crazy ideas. I'd also like to say this article has been here for a scary amount of time. Someguy1221 08:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Entirely non-notable original research. • Lawrence Cohen 13:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.