Talk:Information overload Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Information_overload

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Home Living Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Media Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2013 2014 2017 2022

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Going to delete the sentence attributing this to Thomasius. I thought it was an interesting way to describe the phenomenon so I went digging for the source. Whoever added here probably got the info from this Hedgehog Review article (archived, https://web.archive.org/web/20120504211249/http://www.iasc-culture.org/THR/THR_article_2012_Spring_Wellmon.php). Jumping from the citation, archive.org has the review in question (here, https://archive.org/details/sim_albany-law-journal_1702-03_4_4), starting on page 202. Reading this you can see the nasty text that Wellmon quotes as Thomasius' are the reviewers' words/opinions, and they continue that Thomasius' writing actually argues there is value in the "disease". I couldn't figure out how to re-attribute without making it clunky, unless we want to say "Many Hands" said this.Musicandnintendo (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given the clear danger of information overload, might not this article be spilt in two? The first part: Information Overload up to the year 2000, and the other: Data Overload in the Twenty First Century? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.182 (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are those topics different? I have doubts. Right now Information overload even mentions information explosion as one of its alt names in the lead. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topics are clearly separate and distinct, as is obvious from a cursory review of their definitions. One refers to the aggregate explosion in the amount of information; the other refers to how individual decisionmakers can be overwhelmed by a massive amount of information. One can lead to the other, but they are not the same thing.

Whomever listed information explosion as an synonym for information overload in the lead paragraph of this article understands neither. --Coolcaesar (talk) 16:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the cited work doesn't actually mention "information explosion" at the pages cited. I'm going to pull that link for failing verification.

I just traced the source of that bad citation. It's this edit on 29 August 2018 by User:Typing.nguyen. Unfortunately, if this citation is that bad, all the other citations inserted by that editor need to be double-checked to verify whether they actually support the propositions to which they were appended. This is not one of my core interests, but I'm flagging the issue for anyone interested in this topic. --Coolcaesar (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Typing.nguyen has been only briefly active. Wonder what is the Wiki Fellow thing he mentions on their userpage - the link is dead. Sigh. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion tags should be removed, no merge is needed per above. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Interesting facts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 1 § Interesting facts until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2025 and 29 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BurstingSun (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Tomeijam (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]