Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2024/December Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2024/December

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposed template: Template:Paleo-neornithine-stub 274 articles

This is needed because not all prehistoric birds are birds.

If the template is created, Template:Paleo-bird-stub will be used on far fewer articles, as it will only be used on articles for non-neornithine avialans. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

As long as the folks at the birds project are willing to sort stubs accordingly, I have no opinion on the matter. I leave it to those who understand the taxonomy. Her Pegship (?) 19:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
48 articles

Template will add Category:Bird stubs, not Category:Bucerotiformes stubs, as there are only 48 articles. However, I think 48 is sufficient for a template. It's worth noting that most these currently, though incorrectly, use Template:Coraciiformes-stub. Grey Clownfish (talk) 09:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Support upmerged template. Her Pegship (?) 22:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)