Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2024/April Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2024/April

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
IMO it would be convenient to have a stub category for members of Allotheria, a large extinct group of mammaliaforms. Most of the relevant articles are listed on this template. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Which stub template do they use at present? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

They mostly use Template:Jurassic-mammal-stub or Template:Cretaceous-mammal-stub, but those templates are very unspecific. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 19:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

I think the numbers don't really indicate a need for an Allotheria stub type - there are only 169 articles in both Category:Jurassic mammal stubs and Category:Cretaceous mammal stubs combined. Her Pegship (?) 22:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Those two categories really shouldn't have been created in the first place, they're pretty useless. Also, they're not mutually exclusive with the proposed category. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 10:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

And as far as I can tell, neither category was actually proposed here before creation. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 10:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Trilletrollet, if you want to replace the two existing templates with one for Allotheria, please propose those templates and categories for deletion at CFD. Her Pegship (?) 20:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

No, I don't think they should be deleted. I've mostly given up on this proposal anyways, since it clearly isn't going anywhere. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)