Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/December Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/December

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Proposals, December 2015

Category:Geologic formation stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This stub category is still oversized, so I propose a few upmerged templates to help:

{{China-geologic-formation-stub}} - 37
{{Greenland-geologic-formation-stub}} - 56
{{Ireland-geologic-formation-stub}} - 51
{{Jamaica-geologic-formation-stub}} - 32 --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Based on the numbers here, and the fact that Category:Geologic formation stubs is over 900 articles, I would even support categories for Greenland and Ireland, placing the minimum for any other region at 50. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Support. Pegship (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.