![]() | Before proposing or creating a new type of stub, please read How to propose a new stub type. |
WikiProject Stub sorting![]() | |
Information | |
---|---|
Project page | talk |
- Stub types (sections)
|
talk |
- Stub types (full list)
|
talk |
- To do
|
talk |
- Naming conventions
|
talk |
- Redirects category
|
talk |
Wikipedia:Stub | talk |
Discussion | |
Proposals (A) | talk |
- Current month
|
|
Discussion | talk |
Criteria (A) (discontinued) | talk |
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) | talk |
Category |
|
|
On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.
Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub article you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub templates and categories; we cannot help you with creating articles.
Proposing new stub types | ||
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type. ^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case. |
A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:
List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.
Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.
Hesse geography stubs is looking a bit chubby; I propose making Hesse mountain stubs ({{Hesse-mountain-stub}}) for 114 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Create Rhineland-Palatinate river stubs for {{RhinelandPalatinate-river-stub}}, making it a subcat of Rhineland-Palatinate geography stubs and Germany river stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Another category over the 700 mark, I propose splitting this up by county template with the counties grouped as per Category:Alabama geography stubs. I have run out of energy for typing them up, so if anyone wants them all typed up, tough, honestly I will have them here before I start but just look at the geo cat for now. Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 700, we don't have a decent split of the geo category, in fact we need to look at getting rid of some undersize county categories at some point. I propose templates for the counties and then see if between the geos and the NRHP we can come up with some regions to use.Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, I propose splitting by county templates grouped per the geography stubs. It seems a bit overkill but...
Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs - {{GeorgiaUS-NRHP-stub}}
Atlanta Metropolitan Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BarrowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BartowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ButtsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CarrollCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CherokeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CobbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CowetaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DawsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DeKalbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DouglasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FayetteCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ForsythCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FultonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GwinnettCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HaralsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HeardCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{NewtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PauldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PickensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PolkCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RockdaleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SpaldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WaltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
Central Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BaldwinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BibbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BleckleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CrawfordCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DodgeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HoustonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JonesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LaurensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MonroeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PeachCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PulaskiCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PutnamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaylorCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TwiggsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UpsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
Central Savannah River Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BurkeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColumbiaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlascockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HancockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffersonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JenkinsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LincolnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McDuffieCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RichmondCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaliaferroCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WarrenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WashingtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
Coastal Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BryanCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BullochCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CandlerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChathamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EffinghamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EvansCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LibertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LongCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McIntoshCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ScrevenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TatnallCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
North Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{CatoosaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChattoogaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DadeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FanninCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FloydCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GilmerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GordonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HabershamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LumpkinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MurrayCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RabunCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{StephensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TownsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UnionCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WalkerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
Southeast Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{ApplingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{AtkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BaconCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BerrienCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrantleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrooksCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CamdenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CharltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ClinchCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CoffeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CookCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EcholsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlynnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffDavisCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LanierCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LowndesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PierceCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WareCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WayneCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
Southwest Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BakerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CalhounCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColquittCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DecaturCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DoughertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EarlyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GradyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MillerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MitchellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SeminoleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TerrellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ThomasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WorthCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}
Why do US States require so many counties?Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Still over 600. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:
Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Comfortably over 700, fortunately Portland has a very big chunk of these I propose the following:
Also if we are splitting by county may as well do the others for later ease
Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category is at over 600, could do with a trim beforeir gets any bigger, unfortunatly Texas has a lot of counties. I have based this proposal on the existing split of the geo stubs. I believe all the categories will reach 60 but not sure all the templates will be required so whoever creates this (thats probably me) should only ccreate the categories as they are needed.
Texas Registered Historic Place stubs - {{Texas-NRHP-stub}}
The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies
Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following:
Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the folowing:
Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:
Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:
Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies
Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Following a sort of this category that pushed the film subcat over 600, partly because unlike other countries where we have split actors we don't have an Indian screen actor stubs to put those who do film and tv, I therefore propose the following:
And because there were a number of stage performers I propose the following, it might not yet reach 60 but should do once we sort through the parent.
Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Yemen geography stubs is oversized; I propose these categories:
The result of the debate was create.
West Bengal railway station stubs is oversized; I propose making a subcategory and template (Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs and {{PurbaBardhaman-railstation-stub}}) for 65 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of Ibidionini stubs, which will be a subcat of Ibidionini and hold the categories Compsibidion stubs, Heterachthes stubs, and Tropidion stubs, which I believe have been incorrectly categorized as part of Neoibidionini stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create as Buprestidae-genera-stub.
I propose the following sub-stubs for Buprestidae stubs:
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Ammonite stubs (1,030) is looking extra thicc; I propose splitting it off based on taxonomy:
Epidendreae stubs is oversized; I propose breaking the category up a little more:
The result of the debate was create.
The result of the debate was create.
The result of the debate was create.
See here for the 125 articles awaiting the new template and subcategory of Tephritinae stubs and Acrotaeniini - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
See here for the 74 articles awaiting the new template and subcategory of Pteropliini stubs and Niphona - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create all.
I propose making 7TM receptor stubs a subcategory of Category:Transmembrane receptor stubs (621) and 7TM receptors, as well as some sub-stubs:
See here for the 271 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a sub-stub of the aforementioned proposal. See here for the 327 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Sargodha District geography stubs should be created for {{Sargodha-geo-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was do not create.
United States organization stubs is oversized; I propose the following templates (and subcategories when necessary):
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Nearly oversized, could do with a good sort, a good start to that would be a new category
not all the articles in the petscan would "deserve" the screenwriter tag so a hnad sort is probable and not all would come out of the oversized category but it would be a good start to a hand sort. Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized propose we split out the Cultural organizations. Would also be a subcat of the existing cultural organization stubs
Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
over 700 800 and climbing as I sort the parent category. I propse following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:
Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose a split by decade with templates for any decade that can use them and categories for any that reach 60:
Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Currently in the mid 650s though I am guessing a sort through all Bangladeshi politician stubs would find more I propose a split by region as we already have a similar split for the nation, that is under-utilised. Obviously usual caveats over templates only until we have 60 articles. Please note that although I dont like the AL for Awami League this is what the existing template uses.
Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Templates are over 60 therefore I am requesting categories:
Waacstats (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category:1950s German film stubs (387) is oversized, so I propose splitting it off:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 07:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create as Hungary-MP-stub.
Not sure what to call this category/template (maybe {{NationalAssemblyHungary-bio-stub}}?), but the category Hungarian politician stubs is huge and I want to diffuse it somehow; see here for the articles awaiting whatever the new template/category might be... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create as metal-halide-stub.
Category:Inorganic compound stubs is oversized; I think this sub-template and category should be created to help diffuse it:
The result of the debate was create.
1940s American film stubs is huge, and a majority of the films in that category are Westerns, so I propose making 1940s American Western (genre) film stubs a subcategory of that and 1940s Western (genre) film stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Buryatia geography stubs (647) is a bit oversized, and the stub template has too many transclusions, so I propose making these subtemplates for the individual districts:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Proposing the creation of a new category; {{NovosibirskOblast-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:31, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category:17th-century English MP stubs (115) is oversized; I propose these sub-templates and categories (I might recommend more in the future):
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Propose the creation of a new stub category; {{Paris-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions, and {{Paris-road-stub}} needs a more fitting parent category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
This category is oversized. I propose splitting it up:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{cl}}
and {{clc}}
amy be used for this, as follows: Category:14th-century English MP stubs (698) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Greenland-glacier-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Sorted to below oversized but can do with some more, the following is viable though some of these articles are in already existing stub cats due to the nature of the party:
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700, we don't have perm cats for any smaller areas but List of municipalities in São Paulo gives a list of municipalities by Intermediate Regions also known as Mesoregions. I propose we use these to split the category
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, the next down level is for provinces so I propose we split by these. There are no perm cats so I can't say which if any will pass the 60 mark:
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, according to petscan nearly 300 are novelists, I think that might be picking up incorrect categories but I propose the following:
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category is significantly greater than 700 and could do with a trim. There doesn't seem to be any logical split through the sub-cats so I propose one of the old stand bys of century of birth along the lines of :
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category is closing in on 700 articles, a couple of individual Dioceses have enough articles for there own categories but I think it would be better to split by century of birth, giving us the following, unless there are a lot hiding the first two will be template only:
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Motorcycle stubs is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following category:
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category was just over 600 and needs a good sort however the following appear viable and Ireland would already have some sub cats.
*Irish Christian clergy stubs {{Ireland-Christian-clergy-stub}} - petscan
I would also like to propose that along with the existing Roman Catholic and Oriental Orthodox categories we add one for Anglican clergy
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
The following templates have surpassed the magical 60 mark and so are eligible for a category:
Waacstats (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
I propose breaking up Ammonite stubs into sub-templates/sub-cats:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Make this a subcat/subtemplate of {{Epidendreae-stub}}; there are over 110 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
The following templates have passed 60 and could do with the attached categories:
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, this one near enough jumped off the screen as being viable:
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
over 700 artricles, well sorted to upmerged templates and a few by district categories, no existing templates pass 60 so I propose reorganising by Division but we will need to check the divisions will get 60
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, and British Columbia mountain stubs is over 700 and fortunatly there is a big overlap, also coast geo and mountains have a large overlap and both are over 700 so I propose the following
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create Russian mine stubs.
Over 600 articles, propose the following:
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, propose the usual split of actors, usual caveat of templates first. I have not done petscan search because these tend to be unreliable for actors:
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Members of the National Assembly of Pakistan is currently just under 700, we have split the Punjab regional parliment by party, I propose the same here. One problem is that the categorisation by party in Punjab was a bit sparse and required a hand sort, I assume the problem exists here as well as only 400 articles are in the MNA by party category. Based on that i propose the following with the usual templates first caveat:
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have already split the bishops, I propose the deans follow
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Recently removed all the metal but still large, I propose we continue the removal with the indies going
Waacstats (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Same as before; make it part of Mesosini stubs; 119 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』
The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is oversized; I propose a subcategory for the 85 articles pertaining to Agelasta - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
There are a bunch of Crossotini stubs that pertain to the frea genus; see here for the 84 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of a new category; {{Thailand-singer-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create by party.
Idk what to call this, but I found a bunch of members of the Parliament of Finland that are stubs (over 300 articles). What should it be called? I'm unsure of the name because I've never dealt with a stub type of this nature before... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Waacstats (talk) 13:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
1910s drama film stubs is huge. An overwhelming majority of the transclusions are from American silent drama films; there are over 900 articles awaiting the new template {{1910s-US-drama-film-stub}} and subcategory 1910s American drama film stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
All of these templates will have an associated category
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Templates over 60 so speedy propose the following
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, not my area of expertise but the following look to be viable based on perm cats, there is some overlap but hopefully not too much, this should get it off the oversized list.
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
We have another athletics category break the 600 mark, propose we split this like we have with other countries, by event:
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
We have a split of painting stubs by century, some of these have already been split by decade, given the 17th and 16th century categories are over 600 I propose we atleast create the by decade templates for these, with categories for those that pass the 60 mark, as this would leave the 18th century still by century I propose we do the same for that category as well. So I propose the following for each decade of the three centuries:
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category has over 700 articles, I propose the following splits:
Names are taken from the perm cats, there may be some overlap but I don't think there will be too much. Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Closing in on 700 articles, I propose a split by genre as such:
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
The Germans have over 600 articles here so I propose the following split:
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Comfortably in the mid 600 article range and badly categorised by the looks of things. I propose a split of the documentaries and movve them up a level as they are not categorized this way in the perm cats so:
We also need a consensus on if we go with 'United States blah' or 'American' blah in the parent cat, but I assume this will need to go to CFD Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Extremely large category, too many counties to do all of them, I propose the following counties which appear to have enough articles for a category:
between these they should remove about 300 articles. By the way if anyone wants all 99 counties I have no objection to them creating them. Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
The 2000s sub cat is oversiazed, we have split heavy metal songs out of its parent so propose doing the same with the larger subcats.
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Was over 600 before a nice sort, none of the existing upmerged templates reached 60 however I would like to propose the following two categories with templates
I also see high value in the future for the following three upmerged templates
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category has become quiet large. I propose that we split the archbishops out into a separate category
Waacstats (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:48, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
The template was considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 5#Template:Guangzhou-geo-stub, but was kept. It now has 61 translcusions, so we are all set to create a category. (This is my first nomination here; apologies for any formatting mistakes.) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
This category is big, so please separate into numerous subtemplates/categories:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create as revised.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Another Saudi Arabian geography stub proposal. I'm finding these as I work, so sorry if this comes off as super spammy. Anyway, here are the 85 articles waiting for the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Another Saudi Arabian geography stub proposal; see here for the 79 articles awaiting the new template/category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Same as before; make {{Mecca-geo-stub}} a subtemplate of {{SaudiArabia-geo-stub}}; see here for the 172 articles awaitng the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{SaudiArabia-geo-stub}} is oversized. See here for the 86 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Bago-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Bihar geography stubs is huge. See here for the 90+ articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
maybe a Bhojpur district, Bihar geography stubs and BhojpurIN-geo-stub template? Waacstats (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Kerala-river-stub}} should be a category of India river stubs and Kerala geography stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Gujarat-river-stub}} should be a category of India river stubs and Gujarat geography stubs; see here for the articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
You guys forgot a district from Gujarat. Anyway, please just make a new template ({{Morbi-geo-stub}}); there are only 7 articles that need it. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting off into the following subtemplates/categories:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
114 articles awaiting the new template and category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Viseu-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Seoul geography stubs looks a little chubby, so I propose making Jongno District geography stubs a subcat/subtemplate; see here for the 60 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Not sure how to break this up, but apparently 459 out of the 513 articles in Oaxaca geography stubs are in Municipalities of Oaxaca, so I suggest making {{Oaxaca-municipality-stub}} and its own subcat - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Haiti geography stubs looks pretty big to me; I propose splitting it up into separate templates (and categories, but only for those with over 60 articles waiting)
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Costa Rica geography stubs is pretty big; I propose creating the following templates and categories:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Same as before, but there are 60 articles awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Same as before, but there are 171 articles awaiting the new category and template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Manitoba geography stubs is oversized in my opinion, so I recommend making a subcategory and sub-template for 82 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
I propose splitting up {{NewBrunswick-geo-stub}} into sub-templates (including the one I already mentioned) based on the county:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
65 articles waiting for the new template and cagtegory - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
This category is oversized, a quick scan shows that a good number are french, therefore I propose the following, it wont get it off the oversized list but it will help:
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Not quite oversized but getting there, the following are both viable:
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Another film category over 700, the following are all viable and therefore propose
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Another category over 700, not enough senators have stub articles but there are enough MPs, so I propose the following:
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another category over 700 a couple of partys have enough stub articles to make categories over 60
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
A Large Ukrainian geo category, I propose we split by each of its 3 Raions, Kremenets might be a bit on the small side at the moment, unless there a number of badly categorised stubs so templates first, categories if we reach 60:
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Moving over to Iran, this one has over 700 articles, I propose a split by district, unfortunatly there are no by district categories but a hand sort should allow us to split these by district. I therefore propose the following, with templates first followed by categories for those that pass the sixty mark:
I have left the county name in a couple to avoid confusion with other Iranian districts with the same name, I think every county has a central district. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Having just created upmerged templates I have sorted through some of these (and pushed the category oversized) and so far the following categories are viable:
The Brazil category does assume teams are organisations, which they are according to the perm cats. Note I have carried the spelling of organization/organisation from the fooian organisation stubs. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, over 200 are in the monarchs category so I propose a royal category to fit in with our norms
Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
After sorting the Italian church stubs, this become large enough for a split, I propose by Italian region as we have done with the geo categories, not all regions will get to 60 so templates first, categories for those that make it to 60 (I know Lazio, Lombardy and Tuscany at least make it to 60)
I have taken the names as per the geo split do we need to change the names of the Calabrian and Campanian categories here and in geo to Calabria and Campania. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Well over 600 articles, we already have two by region subcats, I propose we finish this off with the following, and a lot of hand sorting after doing the petscan searches:
please note that the template for Almaty (city) currently exists as a redirect to the surronding region, we also have two upmerged templates without Region for Aktobe and Atyrau which I propose redirecting to the above templates. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Currently at 700 articles with one city split out I porpose we split by the remaining provincal level divisions (a mix of provinces and cities):
Disambigd Gangwon as this historical province is now split between the North and South with both retaining the same name in Korean but being transliterated differently into the Roman alphabet. As the perm cats use the South Korea disambig I followed suit.Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
I was beginning to feel like I was missing out on something with all of Opal's work on the french geo splits, fortunatly it looks like they have left me with a couple of categories with over 700 articles. I therfore propose the following splits:
From Oise
From Nord:
Dunkirk wont be big enough per petscan but I propose the template and if after handsorting there are enough articles the category can follow.Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{US-mountain-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
120 articles awaiting {{Missouri-ghost-town-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Highland geography stubs is kind of oversized, so I propose splitting by committee area:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create all, zut alors!.
{{Avranches-geo-stub}} should be created for 179 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Cherbourg-geo-stub}} should be created for 187 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Coutances-geo-stub}} should be created for 116 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{SaintLô-geo-stub}} should be created for 131 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Lisieux-geo-stub}} should be created for 207 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Caen-geo-stub}} should be created for 220 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Bayeux-geo-stub}} should be created for 127 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Vire-geo-stub}} should be created for 117 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Alençon-geo-stub}} should be created for 136 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Argentan-geo-stub}} should be created for 164 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{MortagneauPerche-geo-stub}} should be created for 205 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
looking through the sports team categories recently, plenty of these for a category as a petscan search shows here
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Fairly large we have already split out the winter Olympics and a couple of other sports, I propose we continue this with the following
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Having sorted the motorsport stubs category I notice there are I was moving a lot of teams into autoracing stubs, as can be seen in this petscan search here so I propose the following
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get a bit large, I propose a by decade of birth split for the decades needed, I think this will mean 1860s through to 1930s. templates and categories to follow the pattern below
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Was our largest none tree of life category. It looks like someone started to split by State, not sure this is the best way to go, but it is the thing that most articles seem to have in them even if not categorized there. I propose the following, obviously templates first and categories only for those that make it past the 60 mark.
I have taken the template names based off the geo split, adding the "State" to the category seems to be enough disambiguation for the geos so I have left those as is here as well. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
We have a number of states with fairly large (greater than 650 articles) Foo members of State House Representatives stubs categories. We have already split Wisconsin by party so I propose we do the same here. All four look relatively evenly split by party, based on perm cats so I propose
Apologies for the mismatch in names, these are taken from the existing categories. By the way did someone recently mention long category names! 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Near oversized, I propose we split out the members of the Senate and Deputies of congress:
If anyone is more knowledgeable on Chilean politics (ie know absolutely anything) can you please check the proposed names of the template/category make sense. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Near oversized, I propose we split out the members of the Senate and Deputies of congress:
If anyone is more knowledgeable on Brazilian politics (ie know absolutely anything) can you please check the proposed names of the template/category make sense. Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Getting oversized, I propose we split out the members of the State Duma
For this one I really don't like the template name but can't think of a better one Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 articles contain the word "lighthouse" therefore I propose:
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, propose the following which should get it off the oversized list:
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, the following are all viable subcats of this:
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Four states have politician stubs that are starting to get a bit large, I propose we split out the state level politicians as we have done in other states so:
Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700 articles, we seem to split out the MLA's first however that would create a category of over 600 so I propose the following set up:
I have followed the perm cats in the categorization of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation MLA's I presume ther has been a joining together or rename or something. Also if anyone has any say with the Saskatchewan party can you get them to change there name as it has given me headaches in trying to come up with a template name for them that follows the pattern of the other parties.Waacstats (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Two Canadian provinces already have MLA splits over 600 and I would therefore like to propose the following
Waacstats (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Category:1920s German silent film stubs is currently the largest stub category at 1485 pages, and therefore needs splitting into its individual years.
The split numbers actually add up to 1499 articles instead of 1485, which is a little strange. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 11:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create without FR.
Split into separate templates, one for each Arrondissement:
The result of the debate was create.
{{HauteSaône-geo-stub}} is a bit chubby, so I recommend splitting into separate templates:
The result of the debate was create.
On today's episode of My 600-page Category, I found more templates and categories I'd like to propose:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:59, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Since this category is extra thicc, I'd like to propose:
I believe that the new categories will be able to hit the 60-transclusion requirement, even without potential false positives... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus.
From the Tajikistan geography stubs category. I found over 120 articles that should get this new template, but I don't know what it should be called, since the name of the district is so long. Maybe {{DRS-geo-stub}}? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 70 articles waiting; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Been doing some stub sorting with AWB (helps prevent carpel tunnel lmao), and I noticed that {{2000s-China-film-stub}} has over 90 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Slovenia-canoe-bio-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:09, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Russia-sailing-bio-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 150 articles awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 90 articles awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
These should be found in Category:American cycling biography stubs:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
There are 71 articles awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:29, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Kayin-geo-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Same as before, but with {{Sughd-geo-stub}} in mind; see here for the over 300 articles awaiting the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Tajikistan-geo-stub}} is a bit oversized in my opinion; see here for the list of articles awaiting {{Khatlon-geo-stub}} and the new category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
{{Analamanga-geo-stub}} has over 130 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 150 pages awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 110 pages awaiting the new template; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
There are 60 articles waiting; see here - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 pages; see here - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 pages await the new template; see here - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 pages; see here for all of them - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list. There are 61 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Over 100 articles under curling stubs have championships in there title so this one should be viable, while a quick count suggests that the parent would not be left too badly undersized (about 50). Therefore I propose
Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
I will be looking at tiding up the sport org category, before doing so could I propose the following templates, potentially upmerged to fooian organisation stubs, fooian sport stubs and sport organization stubs. I feel that this category is currently under used and lots of sports organisations are lost in nation specific sport stub cats, sport specific cats, nation org stub cats and maybe even other places, this will help as otherwise we could be triple tagging articles. We already have a US category so these are feasible, but I will request just the following templates for the usual suspects when it comes to sport categories to see how things look before requesting categories and any further templates:
Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, this subphylum has 4 classes, two of which should be easily viable for categories. I propose the following
I have used the titles of the articles, in the case of millipede(an FA) and Centipede(a GA) rather than the latin names as that seems to make sense, I have no objection to the creation of {{Diplopoda-stub}} and {{Chilopoda-stub}} as redirects. Although proposed the last two would have permcats with a total of 17 articles in them so I doubt will be needed just yet, but editors have been known to occasionally create a load of articles so I propose them just in case. Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
This family level split is just off the oversized list, we have two tribe level subcats and one genus level subcat, I can't find any obvious splits at these levels but the permcats also have subfamily splits which do give viable stub cats for the following which I would like to propose:
Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
A number of countries have subcats that are starting to get large, I would like to split these before they get on the oversize list. IN each case the midfielder stub category is over 600 but if I recall correctly we normally split the defender, midfielder and forward categories by dob at the same time so I propose templates and where viable categories in the following formats for any decades requiring templates and the categories iff they reach 60:
Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large, this department has only three arrondissements so should split nicely between the following proposed templated and categories:
I have not added France or Jura to the categories as I think France is about the only country to use Arrondissement and there appears to be no overlap so I think we are safe here. I added FR to Dole as there are a number of places in Wales, the former Yugoslavia, Nepal and to SaintClaude as there are places in US and Canada.Waacstats (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]