• Vanessa1014 (talk · contribs)
  • Liu Haowei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Liu Haowei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

When my submission is declined due to the reference issue, can I continuing revise the references for further review? Thanks. Vanessa1014 (talk) 02:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@vanessa1014: please do. lettherebedarklight晚安 09:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Yankinthebank (talk · contribs)
  • Algorithmic Contract Types Unified Standards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Algorithmic Contract Types Unified Standards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I really dislike the rewriting because it is so complex. I’ve written to TahoeBlue but have heard nothing. I intend to rewrite it if I hear nothing. I would like your advice on the comments from Willi Brammertz. He’s right, I have made quite a leap in ‘The idea of such…’ paragraph. I hadn’t intended to delve into Szabo, but that’s where Brammertz comes from, so it seems to be a good way into the foundations of ACTUS to expand the page. The Miami paper he refers to is no longer online, but I’d prefer a better published source anyway. In summary: 1) is it OK to talk with him? 2) I’ve no reason to doubt it’s him, but do we just go on trust? 3) His suggestions are solid, but I’m a bit wary of him running the page through me! I suppose that can only come down to judgment. Finally, how do I add (ACTUS) in the title of the page? Thank you for your time and encouragement.

Yankinthebank (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently i wrote an article/biography of the living person but was declined by AFC. Please do let me know the issues and mistake so i can avoid in further one. Sandip0982 (talk) 09:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Sandip0982 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Sandip0982/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

why my article was declined? Sandip0982 (talk) 10:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandip0982 It wasn't just declined, it was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. As said by the reviewer, "The topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". It is also completely unsourced. Please read Your First Article and use the new user tutorial to learn more about Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Haroon Waheed 1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Golden Man Auto Parts L.L.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

wanted to submit this company article so is their anyone who can help me with this Haroon Waheed 1 (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have submitted four times and it has been declined each time, the topic does not appear to pass WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so should I change the title? Haroon Waheed 1 (talk) 10:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you not understand about the reviewer's decline comments? Address those first. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 15:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 79.173.128.122 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SEON Fraud Fighters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I was just wondering if the changes I have now made will make this possible to be published? 79.173.128.122 (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have not resubmitted the draft, so it is unlikely that a reviewer will look at it. Please submit it, and then be patient. ColinFine (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Raisul Islam Ador (talk · contribs)
  • User:Raisul Islam Ador/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please review my sandbox and approve my page Raisul Islam Ador (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Raisul Islam Ador.

Your sandbox article has been Rejected and will therefore never become an article; there is nothing you can do. You do not seem to understand the purpose of Wikipedia: Wikipedia is not a place for any type of self-promotion or advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia: not an advertising platform, directory, or a way to promote a subject. It is not a social media site like Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.

All articles about living people must pass the strict Wikipedia:Notability (people) threshold: you are unfortunately not notable by Wikipedia standards. We also highly discourage you from writing an article about yourself due to the clear conflict of interest.

Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 17:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 89.216.130.27 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Stefan Mihajlov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need more advice? 89.216.130.27 (talk) 19:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been Rejected' and will not be further considered. No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability ColinFine (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]