• Nalon22 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Masoud The silent assassin Minaei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please tell me what is wrong with this page? Thank you very much Nalon22 (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nalon22: did you read the decline notice (esp. the grey box inside the large pink one) and the reviewer's comment below it? They provide a pretty clear and comprehensive account of what is wrong with it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this draft was discussed a couple of weeks ago also, at one of the Help pages. Advice was given then. David10244 (talk) 06:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• EvergreenStudio (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Cooking with Jeremy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey bro, please tell me what to do to improve my wikipedia page for my show. I am ready for any advice you give me. Thanks. Btw this is the guy who made the “Cooking with Jeremy” page. EvergreenStudio (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenStudio: your draft has been rejected as non-notable and won't be considered further, "bro".

You must formally declare your conflict of interest in this subject.

Also, you almost certainly need to change your username, which is promotional and implies shared use. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)@EvergreenStudio: Has anybody who is completely unconnected to yourself written about your YouTube show in detail? Since you released your first episode yesterday, I am guessing the answer is no, but I could of course be wrong. But if there are no independent sources, Wikipedia cannot have an article about it. More info in the notices on your user talk page, and in the "decline" and "reject" templates on the draft itself. Since the draft has been rejected, there is no option for you to resubmit it. --bonadea contributions talk 10:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. But i haven’t uploaded my Youtube Show “yesterday”. It was in December 1. Thank you though for your time to respond. EvergreenStudio (talk) 10:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Fringecreatives (talk · contribs)

I want to create a page for the festival that my NGO runs. I create an article (as I don´t see how it could be done otherwise), submitted it to be reviewed and was denied publication. Iceland Airwaves is the similar festival and I don´t see the difference between their references and mine. The refusal from Wikipedia´s reviewing group was based on not enough credible references - S0091. Could you please explain?

Fringecreatives (talk) 19:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fringecreatives Please read other stuff exists. It could be that this other article is inappropriate and simply not addressed yet. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about.

You must make the Terms of Use required paid editing disclosure. Regarding the draft, it must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the event, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable event. 331dot (talk) 20:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 66.75.89.168 (talk · contribs)

Hello, Just curious as to why my article on Edward Sullam was not accepted. He was a prominent architect in Hawaii but not internationally well known. Could this be why? He was part of the mid-century modern movement in architect. He passed away this part year. Thanks for your thoughts. Karen Buzzard

66.75.89.168 (talk) 20:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please log into your account and/or link to the draft you're referring to, so that we know what you're talking about. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• JAHendler (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rosemary Armao (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The notable person in this article is one of the very early woman investigative journalists in the US, has worked with journalists (especially women around the world), and has worked for top papers and been on teams awarded major prizes. However, as a journalist, she has written the key monographs (and earlier the articles), has edited the major contributions, etc -- for a journalist, objectivity and anonymity (editors not bylined) make it hard to find secondary sources discussing someone, rather than her own work. Further, many of the investigative articles themselves are either in publications that did not yet have web pages when she was working for them (so I cite copies in various archives) and some of the others are behind paywalls -- similarly, I have listed the major papers she has worked for (often the first woman hired before the 1990s) but the bylines of these papers can be found in microfiche in the library -- not on the web. Of particular note is that she was heavily involved in the empowerment of women journalists in Bosnia, Serbia, and the middle east, but again, this was part of her work for IRE and OCCRP and thus it is hard to point to specific instances naming her (esp as in some of those areas, having her name published would have led to expulsion, death threats (which she did receive) etc....

 Of the various entries i've made, the rest were for scientists (before I became more involved in policy) and thus finding the references and awards and such is much easier.  I hope this explanation will help to explain this article -- I do believe I have now met the requirements as stated, but hope this note helps to explain why thie particular journalist is so important.  My assumption is that once a base article is written, the people involved in the Bosnia and Herzogavinia areas, in particular, will be able to contribute to the growth of the article.

JAHendler (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and your question is...? lettherebedarklight晚安 02:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JAHendler Hosts at the Help desks, including this page, are not always page reviewers. It is likely that the page reviewer will never see your note here. That's why the draft itself must demonstrate the notability of its subject. David10244 (talk) 06:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks -- at this point I've resubmitted based on much more carefully going through the requirements, examples, etc -- and thus a new resubmission today would no longer require this ... thanks much for letting me know however, JAHendler (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]