• Gfdiamond (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SKI TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I cannot understand why the SKI TV page has been deleted. SKI TV is a major TV station in the world.

Gfdiamond (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gfdiamond: We don't accept ad copy or bad attempts at SEO. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 18:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Nothing-nothing12345678 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Marcel Ray Duriez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nothing-nothing12345678 (talk) 03:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cherri Gregg

Local broadcaster and a legal nerd . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rovase69 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim the article makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to an in-depth, non-routine, independent news or scholarly source that discusses him at length, is written by an identifiable author, and published in/by an outlet with competent editorial oversight responsible for fact-checking, disclosure, correction, and retractions that supports that claim. If no such sources can be found for a given claim, that claim must be removed. This is a hard requirement when writing about living or recently-departed people and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. You have swathes of uncited content, and seem to have an unhealthy emphasis on direct quotes from him; on top of this most of your sources are completely unacceptable. We don't cite Amazon (online storefront), and nothing he says, commissions, or writes helps a whit for notability (connexion to subject). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 18:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Matrixpressworx (talk · contribs)

Hello,

I'm officially requesting assistance with this article for the following reasons.

1. This article was rejected by user Kaleeb18 on the grounds of "Not Showing Significant Coverage". I believe this to be in error due to the fact that a total of NINE independent sources were 'cited' which seems to be ignored by the reviewer. The cited sources include newspapers, horror websites, Film Review sources etc. As per Wikipedia rules these sources were provided to show the validity of the topic. The reviewer Kaleeb18 seems to have ignored this provided proof which is in our opinion caused the submission to be be treated unfairly. If there is a better way to reference this information on the article this is not clear to me even after reading the recommended review materials. If it does need to be referenced in a different way some CLEAR guidance on how to do that would be appreciated.

2. All efforts have been made to make this article accurate and unbiased according to all rules of wikipedia which I spent a significant amount of time reading. I am independent of the film maker but I do have full permission from Brimstone Pictures / Internet Matrix Inc. to proceed with article creation. Proof of this can be provided. On this note I just received a notice of copyright violation and removal of the poster which is ALSO in error by a reviewer. As per the guidelines on response to this I'm getting the company that made the film fill out and email the required template to show I have this permission.

I understand that my lack of knowledge in the 'processes' of wikipedia are foreign to me which is why I'm sending this help request. All I want to do is the following:

1. Post an article about this award winning short film that has worldwide distribution. 2. Have the article approved as the required references have been provided. 3. Have the poster reinstated as I do have usage permission which will be provided by the company as soon as possible. 4. (And if possible) have someone assist me in formatting the additional information that goes below posters in other movie listings I've seen. Credits, Budget etc. I honestly have no idea how to do this in the article creation tool.

Thank you for your time and assistance with this matter, John David

Matrixpressworx (talk) 10:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matrixpresswork Please see your user talk page for important information. Fair use images cannot be in drafts. You may add the image when and if the draft is accepted. Images are not relevant to the draft review process, which only considers the text and sources.

Large portions of the draft are unsourced. The other sources were not ignored, but are not appropriate for establishing notability. Interviews, announcements, and brief coverage are not appropriate. Some of them deal with the band that made the music for the film, not the film itself(which might merit the band an article). 331dot (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Lordofcorona (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rahul Datta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Lordofcorona (talk) 11:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lordofcorona: All of your prose is completely unsourced, and the vast majority of the filmography is unsourced, with one entry being over-cited. We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim the article makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to an in-depth, non-routine, independent news or scholarly source that discusses him at length, is written by an identifiable author, and published in/by an outlet with competent editorial oversight responsible for fact-checking, disclosure, correction, and retractions that supports that claim. If no such sources can be found for a given claim, that claim must be removed. This is a hard requirement when writing about living or recently-departed people and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 18:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Erdincmusic (talk · contribs)

I am trying to create a wiki page for my company MadRooster Game Audio Lab. I have entered necessary informations about the company such as the industry we are operating, where we are located and our products. I have also inserted two links referencing our website and our products. Unfortunately it's keep getting rejected for not having reliable sources. What other sources I can possibily add other than our website and online store? Erdincmusic (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Erdincmusic: by and large, you should not be trying to create an article for your company, as that constitutes a significant conflict of interest, as well as likely paid editing.

As for why your draft is being declined, this is mainly for lack of evident notability. Notability per WP:GNG requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. Your company website and Unity store clearly do not meet any aspect of this standard. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ShayanXtreme (talk · contribs)
  • Abu Hurraira Dhanani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Abu Hurraira Dhanani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

ShayanXtreme (talk) 12:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ShayanXtreme, Draft:Abu Hurraira Dhanani has been submitted for review, which means that a volunteer will review it eventually. Apologies for the delay, but there are thousands of drafts in the queue and it takes a long time to review them all. I expect someone will review your draft within the next few weeks. Thanks for your patience, and let us know if you have any further questions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Caitlinlee531 (talk · contribs)

Hi! I'm not sure why my request was rejected - any insight would be greatly appreciated so I can work to get it published asap. Thank you! Appreciate it!

Caitlinlee531 (talk) 16:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was rejected and deleted as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• AmandaPantsTX (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lancium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I had previously updated all references from press relaeses and changed them all to news sources with no relation ot Lancium. I am curious to receive more information as to which statements and references are in question so I can either find alternative references or delete the information until more references can be cited.

AmandaPantsTX (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• WarpingSpacetime (talk · contribs)
  • Wave Accelerated Ring Pinch Reactor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Wave Accelerated Ring Pinch Reactor article has been nominated for deletion and it appears that WP policies may be in conflict with one other (i.e. WP:SOURCE "reliable sources" vs WP:SPS "self-published sources" (conference presentation) by the respective Subject Matter Expert (SME) in addition to SME's reliable sources such as peer-reviewed papers that are directly relevant to topic/field and referenced in the WP article). Is it too soon to ask help from WP Administrator? At the very least, can you help in copying article back over to my user page if deleted?

Thank you in advance for your help and guidance!

WarpingSpacetime (talk) 22:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WarpingSpacetime: sorry, not quite sure what you're asking (for), and why at this help desk? The article was accepted, so that's more or less where the AfC process ends. It was then taken to AfD, which is likely to remain open for another few days at least. (And by the same token, you have plenty of time to copy the article contents, if you so wish.) What 'help from WP Administrator' do you feel is needed here? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 98.148.167.84 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Samsung Sam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I added some more references to the page from reliable sources. Please review the page. 98.148.167.84 (talk) 22:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]