• 8.210.170.76 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Vanecha Roudbaraki (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

8.210.170.76 (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 216.174.66.212 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Teodor Bojinović (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

He is part of the history of the Uprising, attested by the sources!

216.174.66.212 (talk) 01:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Suhailsmm (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Firoz Sama (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Suhailsmm (talk) 06:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my page FEROZ SAMA getting denied, what am i lacking

@Suhailsmm: there are several reasons.

• The draft does not show that Sama is according to Wikipedia's definition of notability. Follow that link to see what is needed to show notability.
• The draft is not supported by reliable sources. Websites hosted at Wordpress are not reliable sources, the Sanchar Pati source is just one brief paragraph (and I'm not sure about the status of sancharpati.com in terms of reliability), and the exact same thing applies to Nepal Headlines – a very short text, and the source looks rather weak.
• Many of the claims in the draft have no source at all. Sama's date of birth, nationality, personal history, and trade in gemstones are some of the things that are not mentioned in the sources. How did you find this information? I have removed the names of his children from the draft, per this policy; there was no source and no claim that they are themselves notable.
• The draft is written like an advertisement for Sama. --bonadea contributions talk 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Masterwork (talk · contribs)
  • Masterwork (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Masterwork (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Masterwork

Since I cannot agree with your reasons for rejecting this draft - I wrote it as a brief, factually accurate entry, not an advertisement - I am withdrawing it. I broke no copyright: AVM46 was another identity I used once, clearly in error for which I sincerely apologise. It will not happen again. Thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/User:Masterwork

Masterwork (talk) 11:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masterwork, Robert McClenon was quite clear for why the draft was rejected. There's no appropriate way to verify you're the same person without doing an SPI. It is also worth noting that User:Masterwork was originally created in 2008. You're welcome to improve and submit the original draft (Draft:Karl Fiorini), but Draft:Masterwork has been rejected and will thus not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Curbon7 - If a person declares that they have used multiple accounts, we assume good faith and accept that declaration. SPI is only needed for bad-faith multiple accounts, if they are evasive (as is far too often the case). As we both said, they may work on the original draft, Draft:Karl Fiorini. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this started because I tried to move Draft:Masterwork to Draft:Karl Fiorini, which is who it is about, but there is already a draft there. The submission of duplicate drafts is often done to game the system. In this case, it may have just been a mistake, and they should work on the original draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Masterwork and AVM46: - Why were you using multiple accounts? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Abhayesports (talk · contribs)
  • Zeyan Shafiq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Zeyan Shafiq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I earlier posted for a re-review of this draft, i was suggested changes which i did, but what to do next? I mean i made the changes but how do i post it again for a AfC submission? or if i'm missing something. Earlier the sparse links were pointed out and promotional content, both have been removed and i've written the article as neutrally as i could. Warm Regards---Abhay EsportsTalk To Me 11:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Sidhudiid (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Davinder Bhatti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sidhudiid (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See below. Curbon7 (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Davinder Bhatti

• Sidhudiid (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

Sidhudiid (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sidhudiid, you didn't ask a question. The determination concluded by multiple reviewers is that the subject does not meet the notability criteria established at WP:NMUSIC. The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• JRSpouge (talk · contribs)
  • ONE Apus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:ONE Apus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As part of my response to rejection of my article I would like to change its name from "ONE Apus" to "ONE Apus cargo loss" before resubmission. How do I do this?

JRSpouge (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JRSpouge. Renaming a page is done by moving it to a new name. You may do that yourself, or you can leave it to the reviewer, who will give the page an appropriate name if and when it is accepted for publication. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• MACSAL (talk · contribs)

Liance: Trying to point to business entities in Liberia, West Africa. This draft being an example. Perhaps a STUB works better? Any pointers will be appreciated. MACSAL (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• MiracleCloud (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Environmental-friendly Production (South Korea) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to ask for a new revision on my draft article (title - Draft: Environmental-friendly production (South Korea)), but when I add the This template should be substituted on the article's talk page. template as the Wikipedia instructions suggest, it says, "This template should be substituted on the article's talk page.". I tried adding it both to the draft page and to the talk page of the draft - the result is always the same. I can't seem to understand what I am supposed to do in order to ask for a new review, since my article was draftified after I published it and I changed it trying to better fit Wikipedia standards. I am aware I could move the article to published myself, but when I did last time the article went through a deletion discussion. MiracleCloud (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MiracleCloud (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Nyanardsan (talk · contribs)

Hello there, Recently, I've published my first article about iSpring Solutions, Inc.. The draft was declined. The reason is in description. The editor says it looks like an advertisement. Could you help me to understand what parts I should improve to re-publishe this page again and make it alive? Before writing the text, I was making a little research about other eLearning company's pages. I was trying to use neutral tone and add only independent resources. So, I would like to get more detailed feedback about reviewing. Any help will be much appreciated. Thank you! Ksenya Polukarova (talk) 18:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]