• Dondaestaskanye? (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Evan Nied (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dondaestaskanye? (talk) 02:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the article is notable for their activism in gender equality. Nied's efforts were critical in allowing for the participation of boy's and female business leaders. Since the Neptune Festival is the largest festival in the Commonwealth of Virginia by number of attendees and money generated, and because of Nied's activism in climate change and success in organizing the planting of 7,000 trees around the world, Nied's activism warrants a biography on Wikipedia.

Dondaestaskanye? The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 07:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• ArcherSkulldog (talk · contribs)
  • User:ArcherSkulldog/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I made the article of Skye Folf to help him grow and be able to be recognized like how other people are in the Wikipedia site. If you guys can please accept this I'd appreciate this so much and it help me out so much as a creator to keep making articles.

ArcherSkulldog (talk) 07:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArcherSkulldog The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is almost completely unsourced. All articles, especially those about living people, must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about (in this case) a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person or notable musician. Wikipedia is not a means to recognize someone or "help them grow", they must have already become notable to merit an article. This is just one of many people who post music online, which is possible for any of us to do. 331dot (talk) 07:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 1.22.228.185 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Vinod Mishra (Mumbai politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi This article was created for Vinod Mishra who is a notable figure from Mumbai, he is elected representative and corporator. We have also added relevant references of published in News. Please reconsider this article. 1.22.228.185 (talk) 08:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the top table here. I will be skipping over the sources I am clearly going to be unable to assess due to the language barrier.

• https://www.firstpost.com/politics/bmc-election-2017-here-is-the-final-list-of-winners-in-mumbai-civic-body-polls-3299420.html is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop. If this were an election for province- or countrywide office this would be usable per WP:NPOL, but city-level elected officials are not considered inherently notable.
• https://www.mid-day.com/mumbai/mumbai-news/article/mumbai-bjp-appoints-group-opposition-leaders-in-bmc--22655205 is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop.
• https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/newly-elected-maha-bjp-mlc-sparks-row-with-snide-remarks-116060301236_1.html is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop and sound bite.
• https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/bmc-spent-rs-14k-on-fixing-each-pothole-yet-craters-back-in-mumbai-bjp/articleshow/86216058.cms is useless for notability (too sparse). A supermajority of what the article says about him is direct quotes and/or indirect attributions. No substantial coverage.
• https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/mumbai-bmc-to-order-rs-60cr-o2-supply-to-jumbos-no-shortage-likely/articleshow/86568013.cms is useless for notability (too sparse). Sound bite.
• https://www.indianewsrepublic.in/mumbai-news-cutting-of-mangroves-on-mtdc-land-bjp-leader-vinod-mishra-warns-of-agitation/ is useless for notability (too sparse). The first half of the paragraph ostensibly dedicated to him is routine coverage, and the latter half is indirect attributions.
• https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/bjp-demands-inquiry-into-bmcs-proposal-to-recover-fire-service-charge-7381960/ is useless for notability (too sparse). Indirect attribution and a long direct quote.
• https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/mumbai-news/mumbai-civic-body-releases-frozen-350-crore-corporators-funds-101613414511839.html is borderline. The first paragraph is the most helpful; the stuff about the chat at the bottom of the article is not something that should be added without a much, MUCH better source that explains more in-depth just what is going on there, instead of just quoting involved parties.
• https://www.mumbailive.com/en/infrastructure/bmc-denies-allegations-of-overspending-for-oxygen-plants-in-mumbai-64723 is useless for notability (too sparse). Two indirect attributions, no in-depth coverage of him.
• We can't use https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/bjp-no-need-for-such-spending-in-mumbai/articleshow/86082991.cms (too sparse). Extremely short news article.

Based on the English-language sources, notability has not been met even if the non-English sources are acceptable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 16:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Chlopim (talk · contribs)
  • Chinchilla (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Chinchilla (singer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I feel that the singer CHINCHILLA is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, but I do not have enough experience to create a good article. I would like some help understanding how to write a suitable article. Chlopim (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chlopim Writing an article is the hardest task to perform on Wikipedia; you increase your chances of success and reduce the chances of frustration and hurt feelings by first gaining experience by editing existing articles in areas that interest you, and also using the new user tutorial.

In terms of the draft, interviews are not acceptable as a source to establish notability. An article about a musician must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about them, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable musician. Please see Your first article. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• DK-cchcrp (talk · contribs)

Hi! I really do not understand why the article (Draft:Transregionalism) has been rejected. Transregionalism as a term is very often used among researches of new regionalism and international relations. A lot of new international initiatives (like Belt and Road, Quad (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue), TPP or Indo-Pacific, are letated as TRANSREGIONAL. So it is not a neologism as pointed by the reviewer. but for University's students it would be great to have such a page with a brief and easy theoretical explanation of the phenomenon. Please consider it one more time. Thank you!

DK-cchcrp (talk) 10:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DK-cchcrp You may resubmit it, but any article about this term must show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources that it is in widespread use, as you were told by the reviewer. Note that the whole URL is not needed for a link. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 88.10.153.144 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Iker Unzu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What does a well-known person need to be sufficiently notable in Wikipedia? Because in this case, Iker Unzu has over 8 million followers on the internet, yet he is not considered notable. He has also got a Google Knowledge Graph, which basically proofs his notability, with many other articles/news. It would mean a lot if you could answer these questions and thanks for reviewing the article! 88.10.153.144 (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Followers can be bought, and having a Knowledge Graph doesn't prove anything about his notability as Wikipedia defines it. We don't cite YouTube or Google. Refer to the top table here:

• https://www.heraldo.es/noticias/sociedad/2020/08/03/tik-tik-tiktokers-aragoneses-redes-sociales-1389109.html?autoref=true is useless for notability (too sparse). A supermajority of what the article says about him is direct quotes and/or indirect attributions. No significant coverage.
• https://www.heraldo.es/noticias/aragon/zaragoza/2021/07/31/iker-unzu-ver-a-mis-abuelos-viendo-mis-videos-en-tik-tok-me-emociona-1509917.html " " " " (" "). " " " " " " " " " " " " "/" " ". " " ".
• https://financialfood.es/cacaolat-vuelve-a-contar-con-los-minions-este-verano/ " " " " (" "). Name-drop.
• https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/iker-unzu-1701634 is useless for notability (Connexion to subject). His own podcast cannot help for notability.

Thus, notability has not been shown. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 16:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Bonchee (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Asuquo Ekpeyong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need help with publishing the page for Asuquo Ekpenyong. This is the first time I am working on a wikipedia article

Bonchee (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• RankingPedia (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ranking Latinos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Of the reference sources that the article contains, I would like to know which ones are reliable and which ones are not. By then continue to improve the article

RankingPedia (talk) 18:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RankingPedia, none of the references used are considered reliable or useful towards showing notability. We don't care what the organization say about themselves or what they post. We only care what others say about it in independent published reliable sources. Reliable sources need oversight and fact checking, if they do not have this then they are not usable. This eliminates any sort of social media and user generated content. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:21, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• MONA DAR LISA (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sudipta Karmakar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I wrote an article about Sudipta Karmakar but it getted declined will you help me with itMONA DAR LISA (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MONA DAR LISA (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Sodapoppers (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mz Boom Bap (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm not sure how to prove reference on my wikipedia draft, it's about this hip-hop produce Mz Boom Bap and i'm talking to him directly through instagram, but i'm not sure how to prove it. Sodapoppers (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sodapoppers, things you learn through Instagram are not allowed on Wikipedia. Instagram is not a reliable soyrce. Please read No original research. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Dark Angel23490 (talk · contribs)

Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Hi, why did my value of Shay Wize was declined? I wanted to connect it with the one in Hebrew. I thought that Wiki rules says that if it's an artist that released an album we can write about. And this artist was in Shazam top 50... Did I put there something wrong? Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dark Angel123490: Unfortunately, he.wp and en.wp have different sourcing standards, and en.wp is much stricter than he.wp in this regard. (en.wp is actually one of the strictest projects with regards to standards.) Because of all the unsourced biographical claims in the draft, it can't be accepted. Source or remove them, then try again. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 18:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Annamaria.dmrt (talk · contribs)
  • The Lottery Office (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:The Lottery Office (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Annamaria.dmrt (talk) 23:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :)

Draft:The_Lottery_Office

I sadly have received a decline on a draft which I am trying to publish. The sources for referencing are independent and reliable, there is also a reference on every statement made in the article. There are many references. I really don't know what to do here, can you recommend anything? Are there any references I should remove? If you guys don't want this article published, that's totally fine. I proposed the article as it would be a good addition to Wikipedia, because this lottery has been very mainstream for a few years now in Australia and Wikipedia is outdated.

The comment the reviewer left was: Needs to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about this organization itself, not just tell what they do.

@Annamaria.dmrt: Refer to the top table here:

• I can't assess the Australian source because it is paywalled. (A link is not provided because it autoredirects to the subscription page.)
• We can't use https://www.intergameonline.com/igaming/news/lottery-office-welcomes-lottland-investigations (Unknown provenance). Who the hell wrote this?
• https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/wealth/definitely-not-a-grey-area-online-operator-skirts-foreign-lotto-ban-to-offer-1-billion-jackpot/news-story/af176f30be9d4c2b240a48349464b5f4 is borderline. While the article is ostensibly about them, it doesn't say a whole lot about them.
• https://calvinayre.com/2014/10/15/press-releases/aussie-online-lottery-company-offers-convenience-security-and-multi-million-dollar-jackpots/ is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Clearly-disclosed press release.
• https://au.news.yahoo.com/powerball-jackpots-to-80-m-but-you-could-win-4-times-more-065927177.html seems fine.
• https://www.9news.com.au/national/lotto-news-sydney-woman-nearly-wins-millions-in-lottery-misses-out-one-number/66be85b7-adb3-455c-9b59-6f6f70f53464 is useless for notability (too sparse). Barely even says anything about the company.
• https://www.savings.com.au/savings-accounts/lockdown-lotto-spending-doubles is useless for notability (too sparse, connexion to subject). A supermajority of the article is direct quotes from a company principal, and there's little else about the company itself in the source.
• https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/sydney-restaurant-owner-says-his-17m-lotto-win-saved-his-business-from-covid19/news-story/04bf721f7a4551222fd563b7f3d65fe0 is useless for notability (too sparse). This article is about a lottery winner and doesn't actually discuss the Lottery Office in any appreciable depth.
• We can't use https://licensingnt.nt.gov.au/PublicRegister/PublicRegister/LicenceSearch.aspx (gov't document).
• https://austgamingcouncil.org.au/content/northern-territory-code-practice-responsible-online-gambling is 404-compliant.

Notability has thus far not been met. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 18:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]