• Kingsbangkok2020 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:King’s College International School Bangkok (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Kingsbangkok2020 (talk) 05:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• SanjayGogia (talk · contribs)
  • User:SanjayGogia/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to publish a Wikipedia page for Sanjay Gogia, who has received many scholarships, had been a politician, is a lawyer & has written books on the same. If I am missing out something or has overpraised the subject or has violated any guideless, kindly help me with precise information. SanjayGogia (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SanjayGogia: What you are failing to understand is that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Experienced volunteers have explained this repeatedly. No amount of editing will make the topic acceptable. Editors who refuse to accept a consensus may find themselves in violation of the disruptive-editing guideline. That can lead to loss of editing privileges, and potentially other sanctions. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Bobbysinghnow (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tara lifecare (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Bobbysinghnow (talk) 07:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I've submitted the article for Speedy Deletion - it's an unambiguous advert. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Rathiiikhushi01 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Rathiiikhushi01/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Rathiiikhushi01 (talk) 10:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Mccloughlin (talk · contribs)
  • User:Mccloughlin/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have updated the article completely and conformed to your requirements.

Mccloughlin (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccloughlin: From what the reviewer has written, I believe they may not have intended their review to be the final word. Therefore, I've changed their reject (which doesn't give you the option of resubmitting) into a less drastic decline (which does allow you to resubmit). Before you resubmit, please address the inadequate context in the lead and the absence of references within the description of his technique. Tell the reader in the first sentence what his profession or field was, and give a few words of explanation of 'Anklostomum'. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Presdec (talk · contribs)
  • Argiro Barbarigou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Argiro Barbarigou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have been asked by the chef to create this page, she is a personal friend. I want to ensure that i've adhered to the disclosure rules appropriately.

I also am trying to keep to the spirit of other chef's wiki pages and have heavily borrowed both structure and formating from other famous chefs. I want to ensure that what I propose as a final page is an appropriate wikipedia page. Presdec (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft is stuffed full off totally inappropriate non neutral, trumpery and puffery "Celebrity fans like Jean Paul Gauthier, Carla Bruni and Pierce Brosnan dine alongside the Greek power set and globetrotters" "worldwide known advertising agency," "gastronomical prowess" " audience and fans around the globe" "gastronomic journey" "pioneering authentic Greek gastronomy" "unconditionally answers the call to humanitarianism" "over a dozen best-selling cookbooks" "boasting record ratings" "prestigious Greek cooking school" for example. Theroadislong (talk) 12:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. Understood, i'll edit accordingly and let you know. My aim is to make this a proper wiki page not advertise/promote etc. Presdec (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to make a re-write of the page, I would apreciate some input. Presdec (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Sameerbhosle9 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Sameerbhosle9/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sameerbhosle9 (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can I request you to delete any one page and publish the changes. We will follow the that page thereafter.

Hi Sameerbhosle9. If you have created two drafts about a topic and now wish to delete one, add {{Db-g7}} to the top of the one you want deleted. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Laurenlewis (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:American Political Thought: A Journal of Ideas, Institutions, and Culture (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I submitted an article (American Political Thought: A Journal of Ideas, Institutions, and Culture), for creation. American Political Thought is a new, major peer-reviewed journal of political science, which, like other similar journals, should have a Wikipedia article describing it. However, I received notification that the submitted article was rejected for reason: "undefined." What does that mean? Why was the article rejected?

Laurenlewis (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Laurenlewis. See the reviewer's comment below the pink box at the top of the draft. You may find Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide helpful. The WikiProject also has an essay about the notability of journals. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• MarcoLaudato (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:International Research Center on Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello :)

My article submission has been rejected. May I have more information about what was wrong with my article? In which way can I improve it to make it acceptable for Wikipedia standards?

Thanks for your help.

Kind regards, Marco

MarcoLaudato (talk) 15:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MarcoLaudato: - currently (nearly) all your sources are primary or otherwise non-independent. Sources need to both not be from the organisation but also not inclined to give non-neutral coverage about it by any connection. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• MarcoLaudato (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:International Research Center on Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The previous version of the article has been rejected due to "Fails WP:NCOMPANY requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The organization's websites are primary sources and not acceptable reference."

I apologize for the inconvenience. In this new version, which I kindly ask to be re-reviewed, I have added further independent references. In particular, I have added as main reference the L'Aquila University web page dedicated to the center. Moreover, regarding the center scientific journal, I have added also the reference to its SCOPUS page.

I believe that in this new version the article is acceptable for the Wikipedia standard.

Thanks for your attention.

Kind regards, Marco

MarcoLaudato (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate - please don't repeat any query until 48 hours have passed to give us a chance to answer them

• Kzmba212 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Agora Kizomba Magazine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Kzmba212 (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Kzmba212 (talk · contribs)

Kzmba212 (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have written an article about the first online magazine dealing specifically with Afro-Latin rhythms (kizomba, semba, kuduro, etc). Until now there has never been a magazine on this subject and I found it interesting to write about it, however, the user Dan arndt has rejected my article, the reason he has given is "undefined", I don´t know what it means. I would like to improve my article and I would love it will be published at Wikipedia, What do you advise me to do?. Draft: https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Agora_Kizomba_Magazine Thanks

--Kzmba212 (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to second inquiry below. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Jnthibeault (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Edge Gravity by Ericsson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

So I didn't get any feedback on the initial review. I think it was just punted to deletion because of the perceived copyright violation (which was erroneous). I would really like to get some constructive feedback on the article to know if I can submit it for formal publication or if I need to tweak it in whatever manner. Thanks!

Jnthibeault (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• JSpice85 (talk · contribs)
  • The Creatress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:The Creatress (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi I would like to know why the actors in the film The Creatress are credited in the film in Wikipedia but when clicking the link in their pages, the page doesn't exists or doesn't show properly? Can you approve the page so actors can be properly credited? Thank you!

JSpice85 (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JSpice85: The links show up in red because no one has written an article on that person yet. If that page will be created by anyone, the software behind Wikipedia will make it blue. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Shoethorn7685 (talk · contribs)
  • William A. Harper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:William A. Harper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is my first submission. It is fully proofed and revised, and ready to go. How do I submit it for review? I thought that I hit "Submit for Review", but cannot tell the status.

Shoethorn7685 (talk) 21:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoethorn7685: You submit your draft for review by adding {{subst:submit}} Anywhere on the page and hitting the normal save button you already know. If you copy the code from here, copy it when viewing the page to make things work as intended. Note on file: the current backlog is about 4 months, so please be patient. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Roachmin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Avaail (Streamer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article got declined and I'd like to know why. If it is too short I can work on it some more with my colleagues but I was expecting it to be open to the public first.

Roachmin (talk) 22:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Roachmin: - it got rejected because no suitable sources were used, as explained by the reviewer - twitch/Imgur aren't suitable.

You need sources that are reliable, independent (usually excluding interviews), in-depth and secondary Nosebagbear (talk) 10:39, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Chrisjaymes2 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sons of Chaos (graphic novel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More sources have been added Chrisjaymes2 (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]