• Banana19208 (talk · contribs)
  • MakeMusic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:MakeMusic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need to advice for this article, MakeMusic is a music software company. Banana19208 (talk) 02:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy anything in the Internet which is copyrighted and paste into your draft directly. This is copyright infringement. Details posted on your talk page. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Yvonnemin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:David W. Heinzmann (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Yvonnemin (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your article fails WP:ANYBIO. The company's website is a primary source and LinkedIn is not an acceptable or reliable independent source. The Bloomberg link is broken (but needs to be more that a mention in passing or establishing that he is the CEO of the company). ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 07:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Mouthodock (talk · contribs)
  • Timo Lassy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Timo Lassy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As Finnish wikipedia nor discogs are acceptable I have edited the cites which I now believe are reliable third party references. - birthyear from BBC music - description from www.musicfinland.com website. State granted music information bureau. - releases from MusicFinland, German state radio stations (WDR and NDR), YLE playlist (National Broadcasting Company of Finland) - member of U-Street All Stars refers to U-Street English wikipedia page. etc.

Mouthodock (talk) 07:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The comment left by the reviewer was

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Discogs is not an acceptable source. Neither is the Finnish Wikipedia.

Please also see WP:RS. More info left on your talk page ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 07:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Jirachibi (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:What Are the Oddz? (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was told that it was rejected due to the sources and such being from youtube links and the artist's own website, but the issue is the artist is a more obscure one and, thus, does very few interviews and very few articles are made about him in the news and on music related sites and such, so there are literally no other sources to use. Furthermore, i believe the sources are reliable since they are verified websites and youtube links from the musician themself and not some fan account or anything :)

Jirachibi (talk) 08:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube is not a reliable source. Primary sources do not insert notability. You should include more independent, secondary, reliable sources. More info left on your talk page. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 14:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Neerajmadhuria72014 (talk · contribs)
  • Kartikeya Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Kartikeya Sharma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Neerajmadhuria72014 (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The submission is not supported by reliable sources to show notability. More info on your talk page. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 15:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Josephshlee (talk · contribs)
  • The Upper House Hotel Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:The Upper House Hotel Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

May I seek for advice to enhance this article in order for this page to be published? Thanks a lot Josephshlee (talk) 10:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not supported by independent, secondary reliable source. See your talk page for more info. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Magali Rottiers (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:HugoKé (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Which part(s) do I need to rewrite?

Magali Rottiers (talk) 11:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have remove the copyrighted material. See WP:COPYVIO. Moreover, you need to add more sources to the article in order to insert notability. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 14:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Huntercorprecords (talk · contribs)
  • Favourite Thing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Favourite Thing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please advise me what is wrong with this article. Huntercorprecords (talk) 12:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Huntercorprecords: the reviewer, Dan arndt left you the following explanation: "Fails WP:NSINGLE - possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON, hasn't charted as of yet." Wikipedia doesn't include articles about every single, just ones that meet the WP:SINGLE criteria. You'd need to be able to show how those criteria are met in this case. Also, since you appear to have a financial stake in the artist's success, please review WP:PAID and abide by those instructions before editing further. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked for advertising only account ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Jules1234567822 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Jules1234567822/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

it is real there is a good amount of info Jules1234567822 (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

The whole article is unsourced, which violates one of the core policies - Verifiability. Please see your talk page. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Accessexpertise (talk · contribs)
  • ServiceTitan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:ServiceTitan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Article was rejected on the basis of WP:NCORP, but has 12 sources, all from credible, reliable, third party sources. Additionally, business has three characteristics that make it inherently notable aside from its media coverage: - unicorn status ($1B valuation) - 20% market share across US and Canada - part of the American-Armenian commercial agreement.

When article was rejected, the reviewer also questioned whether I am a paid contributor - I am not (and my contributions reflect this), and am pursuing the publication of this article because it is a notable company in a large market that is making large economic impact in two major countries.

Accessexpertise (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Accessexpertise: please have a thorough read of WP:NCORP. References that are based on press releases don't count towards notability as they are not independent of the subject. No company is inherently notable on Wikipedia - see WP:ORGSIG. Please also read WP:BIGNUMBER. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• MustaphaNG (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:MCskill ThaPreacha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, i made lots of changes from the last article i wrote and added new sources for the subject. The sources are mostly from credible newspapers/blogs who all have a Wikipedia article. Could you take a look again? Thank you.

MustaphaNG (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft was reviewed, and rejected, today by Buidhe for multiple notability failures. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you suggest i do? And also there seems to be a restriction on the page now and i can't resubmit even if i work on it. MustaphaNG (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the draft alone and don't resubmit or move to mainspace. It appears that the article has been AfD'd before. See WP:G4 ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 06:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So this means if i have new sources to improve the article, I'd have to reach out the admin who deleted the page right? MustaphaNG (talk) 13:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Gehill2031 (talk · contribs)
  • Geoffrey Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Geoffrey Hill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need to correct the name of the draft article/page to Geoffrey E. Hill. For some reason, the "E." does not show and I'm concerned since there is already a Geoffrey Hill. These are two separate people.

Gehill2031 (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gehill2031: - articles can be moved names, either "Geoffrey E. Hill" or "Geoffrey Hill (scientist)" would be legitimate names. However drafts shouldn't be moved while in AfC as it can cause complications. I'll add a comment to make it clear - the reviewer can decide depending on what is most suitable. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Egracee (talk · contribs)
  • Fontaines D.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Fontaines D.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Getting a notification that the Fontaines D.C. article doesn't have enough credible sources, but there are plenty of valid citations. Not sure how to fix it.

Egracee (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• CoffeeCowboy (talk · contribs)
  • Jerry Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Jerry Johnson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I'm just looking for help to get my first article up and posted. I feel as if I have met all guidelines what not. If someone could come help me that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance and I hope to become a valued member of this community. Much love

CoffeeCowboy (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CoffeeCowboy. The draft fails to show that the subject is notable. The only independent, reliable source with anything approaching significant coverage is Hypebeast. Throw away the other references, they poison the draft. Then find at least two more sources at least as good as Hypebeast. Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources has suggestions on where to look. You want at least several paragraphs about Jerry, not just a passing mention that credits him as producer.

If you can't find such in-depth sources, then it may be too soon for a Wikipedia biography. In that case all you could do would be to wait for more to be written, or choose a different topic to write about, because no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]