• Mmaselli (talk · contribs)
  • William Horrmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:William Horrmann (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I respectfully disagree with the reasons behind not publishing the article about William Horrmann and the Horrmann Castle as not only it is a pretty well known Castle on Staten Island. Also, the references provided are all from 3rd party such as the local newspaper or historical archives and not from family blogs, etc.

Mmaselli (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this was a poorly thought out decline. The subject appears to be a notable historical figure. I've commented on the draft and asked another editor to take a look at improvong the page Legacypac (talk) 01:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mmaselli, I agree with the decline (sorry Legacypac). What is the subject? It starts off as a biography of the man, moves on to the brewery business, and ends up with the house. Would you stick {{Infobox person}}, {{Infobox company}}, or {{Infobox NRHP}} on the article? You need to decide what the article is about and structure it accordingly. Cabayi (talk) 08:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Grillage 2 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Grillage 2/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Grillage 2 (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Hi! I am a bit confused on how to insert the information you requested as this will be a hard cover book. It will NOT be on the internet![reply]

This makes no sense. We can't accept your page on the Brooklyn Bridge Legacypac (talk) 01:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Nicoledomingo.newscorp (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kidspot.com.au (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nicoledomingo.newscorp (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like advertising. May be worth mentioning in the article about the parent company but will not be approved here. Go read WP:COI and comply Legacypac (talk) 01:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Volker from YAJA (talk · contribs)

It was the first version of the page. While it has been rejected, it is open to improvement. As the author and co-founder of YAJA I would like to have some input as to how exactly I can improve the content in a way that will suit Wikipedia's guidelines. Volker from YAJA (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Most of the references in your draft are primary sources, which does not add notability to the subject. Please also see your talk page for how to disclose a COI as you are clearly affiliated with the subject (as a co-founder). ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 03:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Dyna Dyna (talk · contribs)
  • Anne Amie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Anne Amie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dyna Dyna (talk) 06:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Dyna Dyna (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

Both the drafts you started are a single sentence. The one on the singer is an ad for the singer's instagram not an article. Legacypac (talk) 06:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• JulienL92 (talk · contribs)
  • Propulsive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Propulsive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'd like the page to be re-reviewed as there have been added a few more notable references, as requested/recommended

JulienL92 (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JulienL92: - hi there, 2 things.

1) It's great if you react to the decline reason and add sources. However all you need to do is re-submit it and it will be re-reviewed. If you think the original review as wrong then ask here.

2) While I was here, however, I took a look at the two sources. Neither is in-depth enough and I don't believe the first is independent - it seems to be coming from the individuals, even though it's within a publication. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• LITERATURASHISPANOAMERICANAS (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ana Galdós (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I created the page Ana Galdos under the username account, LiteraturaHispanoamericana. I could not login in again (I did not submit an e-mail address the first time) so I created a new account LiteraturasHispanoamericanas. Could you consolidate or move this two accounts into one? Carmela

LITERATURASHISPANOAMERICANAS (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Porcellumripam (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nordic Nanovector (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Moderator rejected this page on the grounds that "the page reads like an ad". Would be gratefull to have this eleborated on in order to know which paragraphs are causing offense. The key reasoning behind the page is that it is important for the public to easily find clinical trials for cancers, and this in turn means that such wikipedia pages are highly valuable.

Porcellumripam (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Shamar54 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Shamar54/sandbox/Shamar54 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Shamar54 (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A blank draft. Legacypac (talk) 07:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• NathanPeters406 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mission Springs Brewing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I am writing as I am confused on the notability criteria for my attempted article for Mission Springs Brewery. I used multiple Wikipedia articles as references for this article and made sure I matched the quantity and quality of sourced articles for the Mission Springs article. Please explain why the following articles were accepted and published as they contain the same if not less, quantity and quality, of sources for the Mission Springs Article, I had previously submitted. I do not believe that these pages are any more "notable" than the one I have submitted. If I completely missed something, my sincere apologies, please suggest any recourse that you think would be appropriate for me to improve this article, thus improving Wikipedia. I appreciate your time and suggestions. Thank you very much,

Nathan

- https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Nelson_Brewing_Company - https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Russell_Brewing_Company - https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Lighthouse_Brewing_Company - https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Parallel_49_Brewing_Company

NathanPeters406 (talk) 22:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NathanPeters406: I think the main problem with your draft is with the source material you have used. In general, you should use sources that are as independent as you can find. In the case of Mission Springs, there are two dedicated articles in the Vancouver Sun here and here that could be used. On your draft page, if you click "show" next to the "Editor Resources" panel, there should be a link to "news" - click on that and you should get a list of other news citations like the Vancouver Sun - use those to write your article and resubmit, and it should be accepted. Russell Brewing Company uses such sources. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very popular regional brewery. Legacypac (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]