• Sean Branagh (talk · contribs)
  • Megan Walsh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Megan Walsh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. Megan joining Celtic Woman is not something news sites will jump all over immediately. As she is very new to CW, there is not much out there to use as references just yet. I put in two references from the Celtic Woman web site, announcing Megan. Surely there is no more reliable source than that? I could have included posts on the CW FB page about their first show, but I understood that social media links are not considered a reliable source. The Irish Independent newspaper announced the Wexford concert, but the girls are not mentioned by name, so I cannot use that one. I have searched well and cannot find anything more right now, but I will add as they appear. I have no idea now how to get this article accepted. They tour the USA in December and maybe there will be references to Megan then, but I was hoping to get this published before then. Your advice would be appreciated.

Sean Branagh (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi @Sean Branagh: To show notability, sources must be independent as well as reliable. CW and Megan are associated, so their announcements are primary sources. It is too soon for an article if there is no coverage by secondary sources yet. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello Frayae. I am new to this and still trying to figure this out. I hope this is the way I reply to you. I found one external link and added it. This is from the Kentucky Network announcing Megan as teh new member for the November USA tour. Is this enough to resubmit the article for approval? Sean Branagh (talk) 10:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ket.org/event/celtic-woman-best-christmas/

• That is not a good enough source, you need something with in-depth information, which is not affiliated with the subject or an event to do with the subject. Like a newspaper report. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Prertham930pk (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Niveditha Gowda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Prertham930pk (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Please read the notices left on the article. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Rhetos123 (talk · contribs)

Hello
Few weeks ago I have written an article on a polish publishing house called Rhetos. My submission was declined on 30 August, due to lack of sources. Soon after, I have provided reliable references for the information included in my draft. An article on this publishing house already exists on the polish wikipedia and I would like to connect it to the english version.
My question is: can the draft be accepted now? and if not, what else could I improve to make it happen?
Thank you in advance.
Rhetos123 (talk) 07:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi @Rhetos123: Your draft will be reviewed when a reviewer gets to it. The backlog is quite long and this could take a while. You should add secondary sources to the article, sources not affiliated to the publishing house itself. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you @Frayae: I've just added a link to the ISBN database, where Rhetos is registered as a publishing house. Thanks for your response and advice, I will wait for a reviewer. Rhetos123 (talk) 13:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Sagarshah28 (talk · contribs)

Hello team,

The user/reviewer who reviewed my above mentioned article draft is no longer involved in Afc. I just wanted to know how do I submit the article for the re-review to another user/reviewer.

Kindly, do the needful.

Sagarshah28 (talk) 09:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi @Sagarshah28: Add {{subst:submit}} to the draft. Please consider rewriting the lead section to better reflect western medical terminology. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• מיקרוז (talk · contribs)
  • Oshri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Oshri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

is there any way to speed the review? מיקרוז (talk) 12:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• No, reviews are done randomly as drafts are reviewed in no specific order. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 23:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• AR.Dmg (talk · contribs)

i did not understood why the article i submit for review got declined. i added the reference also. what are the trusted reference that can be used for article creation. please assist me. KaSh (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Please read the comments left by the reviewer. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 23:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Shishir1807 (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

I would like to know if there are any methods to speed up the draft review process,because it says it might take over 2 months Shishir1807 (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• It is not possible to speed up the process, although your draft my be reviewed quicker than two months since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 23:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]