• Jean Scott Thomson (talk · contribs)
  • Clive Wilkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Clive Wilkins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I had a draft entry on Clive Wilkins deleted because of apparent copyright infringement. I have copyright control of the assumed offending text and have removed it from the 'offending source' and place where, what was considered to be similar material, appeared. The section describing Clive Wilkins success as an artist taken from newspaper cuttings is simply what it is, a listing of newspaper cuttings, used to reference and date the subjects success as an artist. Te text only appears on Wikipedia. Is this enough to continue using the material? If not how do I go about proving I have the right to use this material, which I collated, collected and originated in the first place! I could rearrange the order of the texts, but what is said will remain the same.

Jean Scott Thomson (talk) 04:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Donnascb (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rosh Jalagge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Donnascb (talk) 08:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Donnascb, Unfortunately the subject is not notable under Wikipedia guidelines. Comments are same as previous reviewer. Please read WP:Your First Article for further info and see kindly read Wikipedia notability guidelines. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• MiaMaiaHK (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

Hi, I would like to know why my article declined? Thanks.

MiaMaiaHK (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MiaMaiaHK, I believe you are referring to page User:MiaMaiaHK/sandbox. If you read the top box on the page, it indicated the content is promotional which Wikipedia would not accept for article as such to be published. Also, your username is the same as the company name/brand of the article, which might mean you are affiliated to the subject of the article, which means you have conflict of interest (COI) here. Wikipedia is discourage editor with COI to edit the content or create the affected article. You could find how to disclose your COI here. Please read WP:Your First Article to understand what is required and how to write an article in Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Razar08 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Create Items/Goods - Frontier Pilot Simulator (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, how can we create an official wiki game page? with modding instructions and etc. Razar08 (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Razar08, Greetings to AfC help desk. Your draft article Draft:Creating an Addon - Frontier Pilot Simulator has been rejected as Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook, for such it is not pass the requirements to merit a page in Wikipedia. - pls see WP:NOTGUIDE and read the comments given in the box at the top of the draft page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Semimbatic (talk · contribs)

Unfortunately my article about Matthias Tanzmann is not yet published and I don´t know how to change this. Someone wrote "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability". I deleted the references I have put below the article and really tried to write it in a neutral language. How can I change it to finally publish it? Semimbatic (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semimbatic - Not all subjects are suitible for Wikipedia. As a new editor, you need to prove that the subject in question (Mr. Tanzmann) is notable enough for wikipedia. That means you need to show that reliable independent sources talk about the subject in depth. I think the reviewer didn't think the sources given let the subject meet the General Notability guidelines. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nyonicarol (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Anoziva Ishe Marindire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nyonicarol (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Jawillia (talk · contribs)
  • PRxPR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:PRxPR (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The reason given for declining this article were "The mentions of PRxPR are brief in the references used; can you find sources that provide more extensive coverage", however, at least two of these articles spoke more than just casually about the purpose of this organization. Coverage of Hurricane Maria's effects on Puerto Rico, and specifically how to help is not easy to come by, but in fact PRxPR is the one organization most mentioned in these articles. The reason is - as my article attempts to state, that PRxPR is made up of Puerto Rican Businessmen, and ALL expenses to run the organization are covered by them. I am not affiliated with this organization in any way, just think that it deserves this inclusion.

P.S. several of the other "Non-governmental organizations" I looked up prior to submitting this have even less significant/fewer citations. This is not an easy category to find citations for...

Jawillia (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jawillia. PRxPR sounds like a commendable organization. I agree with the reviewer, however, that the coverage of it is too brief to justify an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia doesn't include things because they're worthwhile, or because more people should know about them. It only includes things of which the world at large has taken significant notice.

Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. The existence of articles that do not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines does not mean they have been in any way "approved". It may simply mean that no one has gotten around to deleting them yet. They are not a good excuse to create more such articles. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles, be sure to use only Wikipedia's best, such as Seacology. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:29, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Asymetrical722 (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

You deleted my article Sheet Timing or someone did for infringing on a copyright but the site in question is actually mine and there is literally NO other examples anywhere I've found but your site is so damn complicated needlessly I don't even begin to know how to respond. Milowerx.com is my own website and I actually TEACH Sheet Timing at studio Arts here in Los Angeles so I am definitely an authority on Sheet timing and can speak on these matters. I am not infringing on anyone's copyright except I guess my own. I learned how to sheet time at Hanna Barbera back in the early 90's and have been doing so for the last 30 years. You should undelete this page and let it stand.

Asymetrical722 (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Asymetrical722. If your website is the only source of information about the topic Sheet Timing, then Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject. The encyclopedia covers only topics that have gained significant attention by the world at large.

If there are multiple, independent, reliable sources that go into some depth about Sheet Timing, then it would be a viable topic. In that case you might be able to use material you've published elsewhere as a source, although scholarly or news sources are much preferred to commercial websites. Citing your own work is not encouraged, because it's difficult to be objective about it, but it is not forbidden if it's done carefully. You may even be able to use copyrighted text you've written (there are links to the procedures for donating it to Wikipedia in the second paragraph of the speedy deletion notice on your talk page). Generally, however, even if you surmount the copyright problem, you will not be able to use the text from your website because the way to write for an encyclopedia is so different from the way to write for any other publication. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]