• AkshayChhibber (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ucertify (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need to ask an assistance from the help desk, that I love to write about my experiences & I am also a blogger. I wish to write about my experience with uCertify and have taken all the details and posted with references. It was declined earlier as well. It is my humble request as to clear my discrepancy and confusion here and please let me know how can I fix this issue. Because now I have given some other references as well which was the issue earlier. So kindly clarify that whether it's the problem with the content or with the references. Also, do suggest exactly what shall I do and write so that my article gets approved this time. I desperately need an assistance. AkshayChhibber (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AkshayChhibber. Wikipedia's content is not determined by the experiences of its editors, but by information previously published in reliable sources. Based on the cited sources, the company does not appear to be notable (does not appear to be suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). Wikipedia is not for advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keith Grant (talk · contribs)
  • Alan Grant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Alan Grant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have had a submission to Wikipedia turned down on the grounds it read like an advertisement and that the sources appeared to have been created by the author. I would request clarificaion on this as the sources were definitely independent and certainly not created by myself (The Times, Financial Times and reputable engineering journals). I have hard copies of the articles but no links as they pre-date internet by many years. I can happily supply those articles as proof. The content on Alan Grant, I feel is relevant in relation to his design of submerged floating tunnels as a contribution to scientific advancement. I should note that Alan Grant's design of a floating tunnel is quite widely referenced in other Wikipedia entries, though not in such detail. Best regards and many thanks for your consideration. Keith Grant (user name)

Keith Grant (talk) 09:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keith Grant. The declined draft notice contains a lot of boilerplate, all of which is true and important, but the reviewer may not have meant that all of it is a problem with this particular draft. The author of the UPI story seems to have gotten their 100 words about Grant from Grant, and the reviewer may have been referring to that sort of lack of independence, but I haven't examined the offline sources. Offline sources are fine. You don't have to supply copies of them, we can get them through libraries, but there are two things you could do that would be most helpful.

Omitting footnotes is basically telling the reader, "I used information from these sources, but I can't be bothered to tell you which pieces of information came from which sources". You are allowed to do that, but it isn't very reader friendly (or reviewer friendly). Consider improving the draft by using footnotes as described in Wikipedia:Referencing for Beginners. For the offline non-English sources, consider going a step further, and including in the citation a brief quote of the original text. See the "Additional annotation" section of Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dineshkrish (talk · contribs)
  • Brother's Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Brother's Day (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have provided most suitable reference links I found for Brothers' Day page. However, I am being asked to provide a better and detailed authority link, but I cannot find any such high authority reference link. Can you please help me find more details about it, or any other guideline which can get this page accepted with the existing reference links provided?" Dineshkrish (talk) 10:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Jacqueshobbes (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:List of performances by the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello everyone, I created this article but all of a sudden the column width needs to be fixed, plus I seem to be unable to position the references section below the table. Thanks for your help, jacqueshobbes (rookie). P.S.: When can this article be linked to the main "West-Eastern Divan Orchestra" article? Only after having been reviewed, right?

Jacqueshobbes (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jacqueshobbes. The last line of the table needed to be |} to close the table. This has been fixed for you, and resolves the symptoms you observed. You are correct that articles should not link to drafts. If the review of the draft results in acceptance, it will be moved to article space and may then be linked to. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nad Saab1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:IMAL (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nad Saab1 (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)I have written an Article about iMAL, a product from Path Solutions. http://www.path-solutions.com/imal.php I have put it for review but it seems it was rejected for a subject's notability issue. I don't know why I'm not being able to publish these few lines on Wikipedia. I need help in creating an article. Who can helpNad Saab1 (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC) Nad Saab1 (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Chiboy14 (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

Chiboy14 (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DID YOU WANT TO BE A PROF.CONTACT NAZE SEC SCHOOL IN IMO STATE OWERRI

• Deep1995 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dhudiya Entertainment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Deep1995 (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Lblakely (talk · contribs)
  • George Everett Osterhout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:George Everett Osterhout (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

RE: Submission of my draft article "George Everett Osterhout", on 25 June, 2018.

Submission declined on 26 June 2018 by MadeYourReadThis (talk). "This subject can probably meet notability guidelines but has formatting problems that should be addressed first. Also, where did this text come from? It appears to have been copied and pasted from somewhere raising copyright questions."

My replies to MadeYourReadThis:

(See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MadeYourReadThis&oldid=847783490)

1. 18:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

"There are two short quotations, each enclosed within quotation marks and followed by a reference number.

If something else makes it appear that other parts of the article were "copied and pasted", or if there is some other reason for nonacceptance, please explain.

Thanks"

2. 18:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

"Let me state clearly that, aside from the two quotations mentioned in my previous message, the text is entirely of my own composition."

I received no further comunication from MadeYourReadThis, and his Talk page appears to have been erased.

User KylieTastic became involved (see: https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:George_Everett_Osterhout ), but I cannot determine in what role that might have been.

How can I resubmit my article for review, hopefully without the damaging remarks by MadeyourReadThis.

Many thanks for your response.

Lblakely (talk) 22:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lblakely - Looks like your article has been accepted! Congratulations.

Regarding the user's talk page, some users WP:archive their talk pages; so it's not been erased, simply moved to the user's archive. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]