• DiplomatTesterMan (talk · contribs)
  • Peacebuilding in Jammu and Kashmir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Peacebuilding in Jammu and Kashmir (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am not sure if this is the place to ask, but since the article is an AFC submission and this question relates to getting the article into mainspace and passing the AFC review, I guess I will try asking here.
There is a section in this draft - "List of initiatives" and I have the subsequent points in this section in a bulleted list. Is this format ok for such a Wikipedia article, or should I change the header to "Initiatives" and convert to paragraph form? Thank you. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DiplomatTesterMan: It would be better if you rewrite it in paragraph form. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Abelmoschus Esculentus: Thank you. I will try and change it into paragraph format. Regards. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 12:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• KH Fajla Rabby (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:KH Fajla Rabby (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

KH Fajla Rabby (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NBIO and WP:AUTO. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 05:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Modisanjeev2015 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Modisanjeev2015/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Modisanjeev2015 (talk) 07:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NBIO. Your draft clearly fails it. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• AhmadAlsarraf1 (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

AhmadAlsarraf1 (talk) 07:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft fails WP:NBIO and I recommend you to add more references. Please also note that Wikipedia is not the place for promotion. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 08:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• MaciekKubiak (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:VocApp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

MaciekKubiak (talk) 08:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I would like to request a re-review of my article. I have added all the possible sources, and I believe that it is not written in promotional tone, hence I think there is no reason for it to be declined now.

--Article was speedy-deleted for promotionalism Nosebagbear (talk)

• Bethcarey (talk · contribs)
  • Dagmar Evelyn Cyrulla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Dagmar Evelyn Cyrulla (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello - I have added references to the article since its rejection based on lack of reliable, secondary references. Could someone please advise if my references are now adequate? thankyou Bethcarey (talk) 09:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bethcarey. Draft:Dagmar Evelyn Cyrulla is back in the pool of drafts to be reviewed. You may continue to improve it while you wait. I've left small basket of links on your talk page. They lead to many more links about writing better articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Fersanlo58 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Uniom por Umha Democracia Nacional Galega (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

}}

I've been trying to publish an article about UDNG, a Galician Independence Party of which I am the legal agent.

The Draft and (I think) the consecutive rejections can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Uniom_por_Umha_Democracia_Nacional_Galega

I think similar issues can be found in lots of Galician Independence Movements that ara already included in the English Wikipedia (there's some problem with free press here):

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Xeira?wprov=sfti1

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Comité_Revoluzonareo_Arredista_Galego?wprov=sfti1

and even the Galician People's Union - Proletarian Line, related to Galician writer, Xose Lois Mendez Ferrin

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Galician_People%27s_Union-Proletarian_Line?wprov=sfti1

UDNG is seriously committed to actual Galician Independence Activism, and would like to figure, as an extra-parliamentarian, but legal force (don't know if all the above accomplish these conditions) in your Encyclopedia.

I think it would work searching for "Uniom por Umha Democracia Nacional Galega" here: https://servicio.mir.es/nfrontal/webpartido_politico.html (and also checking the alleged "parties" mentioned above.Fersanlo58 (talk) 16:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For some of my recent work analyzing the workings of Galician Administration about Law, Environmental Regulations, and Economic Corruption, you may have a look at this link in the Left Wing activist-oriented media group Z Communications: https://zcomm.org/zblogs/udng-statutes-a-series-of-proposals-to-north-american-left-wing-political-movements-or-for-an-option-among-lincoln-county-road-and-armaggedon/Fersanlo58 (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Fersanlo58 (talk) 22:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Fersanlo58 (talk) 22:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fersanlo58 (talk) 09:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fersanlo58 (talk) 09:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Fersanlo58 (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Fersanlo58 (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fersanlo58. This is not the place to get the word out about anything. Unless the topic has been covered in depth by multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, there should not be an article about it on Wikipedia. To borrow a phrase from another reviewer, "Existing mistakes that we've missed do not excuse new mistakes". --Worldbruce (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• NURA MUHAMMAD MUHAMMAD (talk · contribs)

NURA MUHAMMAD MUHAMMAD (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft is currently nominated for speedy deletion for being overly promotional. I believe the nominator is correct to do so. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Musicguy6912 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Henrik Ofeldt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Did some edits in terms of the references and removed the ones that had bad sources. Musicguy6912 (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Musicguy6912 The draft doesn't cite a single independent, reliable source containing significant coverage of the subject. Without at least three such sources, the topic is a non-starter for an article. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources for some examples of the types of sources to look for. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• IndianHistoryEnthusiast (talk · contribs)

The article I posted on Anand Ranganathan was declined. The person in question appears on various media platforms regularly. He was also invited as a speaker in the World Economic Forum. and has given Ted Talks.

He has also been covered extensively for his tweets. https://www.opindia.com/2018/11/tweets-by-scientist-and-columnist-anand-ranganathan-critical-of-judiciary-blocked-from-being-read-in-india/ https://www.opindia.com/2018/11/tweets-by-scientist-and-columnist-anand-ranganathan-critical-of-judiciary-blocked-from-being-read-in-india/

And his work on Tuberculosis. https://scroll.in/pulse/892562/lab-notes-only-optimal-levels-of-a-cell-division-protein-allows-the-tuberculosis-pathogen-to-grow https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/indian-researchers-use-a-novel-route-to-kill-tb-bacteria/article18508931.ece

IndianHistoryEnthusiast (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]