• Kaiquealvesb (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kaique Alves (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I can't publish my articles, it saying that my sources are not reliable, but all sources are from Globo,G1,Futura,Kondzilla, Some of them are in form of interviews, stories by those tv channels. And in the Production company, Kondzilla cited all the work that Kaique has been done with the company. What do I need to do to make it work? thank you very much.

Kaiquealvesb (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaiquealvesb: Because Alves has worked with Kondzilla, any sources from Kondzilla are not independent. Same goes for interviews. You need to use sources that are not connected to Alves nor any company he has worked with, but still specifically and primarily about him. (So, if you had an independent source that is about Kondzilla, that would not be good enough). I recommend just finding 3 to 7 (5 is fine but you must have at least 3) sources that meet all the following points:

• Not connected to Alves, Kondzilla, or any companies they are connected with
• Provides in-depth coverage specifically and primarily about Alves
• professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources

Each source has to meet all three points, you can't just use a source for each point. Take the 3-7 sources that each meet all three of those points and summarize and paraphrase those points, following each summary with in-line citations. Then post that to the draft. That will very clearly establish notability right away. You can find more detailed instructions at User:Ian.thomson/Howto. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dora's ice lolly (talk · contribs)
  • User:Dora's ice lolly/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

Thank you for your comments, but before writing the article I looked at the following Wiki articles about a similar organisation in the UK, the House Rabbit Society:

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/House_Rabbit_Society

I also looked at the following wiki article about a small breeders' organisation in the UK:

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/British_Rabbit_Council

The organisation I wrote about are a UK charitable organisation registered in the UK, the first national charitable organisation for the welfare of rabbits, who are the most popular pets after dogs. It seems unreasonable to deny them an article.

Thank you Dora's ice lolly (talk) 01:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is talking about Draft:Cottontails which does not seem to meet WP:NCORP. Legacypac (talk) 02:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 68.103.78.155 (talk · contribs)
  • 2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The 2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season article needs to move from a draft article to a main article because it has 4 Templates and 1 Reference and needs to have more templates and more references and needs to be a article now. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 02:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 02:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No too soon. No content yet. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Manzoor Ahemad (talk · contribs)
  • User:Manzoor Ahemad/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Manzoor Ahemad (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We can't help blank requests for help. Legacypac (talk) 05:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DiplomatTesterMan (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Meghalaya mining disaster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Should I have directly created this article in mainspace, or is taking the AFC route ok? DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 07:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page was accepted Legacypac (talk) 08:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Blendar33 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Julian Osula (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I'd like for you to re-review this article because, I don't know the person neither do I work for him and I believe the article met WP:ANYBIO neither is it for WP:SPIP purpose. I created the article for more people to know about the famous Nigerian' King of Luxury Item. Kindly re-review.

Thanks. Blendar33 (talk) 09:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Padamraj.joshi (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mirror Khabar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Padamraj.joshi (talk) 12:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Padamraj.joshi: You need to cite at least three sources that each meet all of the following points:

• professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources
• Not by the Mirror Khabar, nor Padam Raj Joshi, nor anyone affiliated with them
• Specifically and primarily about Mirror Khabar.

Without three such sources, the article will never be approved. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 49.34.184.15 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Technical .k/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

49.34.184.15 (talk) 16:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Entry was created by a sockpuppet of a blocked editor and so has been deleted.

If you are a completely different person, then you can create an article by following these instructions. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Origintd (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mylan Murphy Motivational Speaker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Origintd (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC) I am requesting a re-review because I feel that the content for the page is appropriate and necessary to be created with the involvement this individual has in numerous communities as a reputable business man and motivational speaker. If my content is done improperly or the format is incorrect, I ask for your assistance to get it within formality so this page is able to be accepted. Please let me know what I have done wrong.[reply]

@Origintd: You didn't cite any sources. No sources, no article, period. It has nothing to do with formatting or formality, it has to do with verifiability and notability.

You need to cite at least three sources that each meet all of the following points:

• Professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources
• Not by Murphy, nor anyone affiliated with him
• Specifically and primarily about Murphy

Without three such sources, the article will never be approved. You can find more specific instructions on how to write an article that won't get rejected here. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• (Probably self) promo. No notability. CSD G11 Legacypac (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DevinAlmond (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Annette Mueller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I have recently tried drafting this wikipedia page! I received feedback that it sounded like an advertisement and the references used were insufficient.

I was wondering if I could have more specific feedback, now that I believe I have corrected the draft based on the above feedback, before I resubmit the article for review.

Anything would help!

DevinAlmond (talk) 23:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DevinAlmond. The subject does not appear to be notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia), so there isn't much point in resubmitting the draft, but if you want more specific feedback or a third opinion, resubmitting it is the way to get one. This help desk is not a shortcut through the review process. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]