• Truthfunbug2 (talk · contribs)
  • Nils Christensen (aviator) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Nils Christensen (aviator) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I just had my first article accepted. When I try to find the article on google, and type in "Nils Christensen" or "Nils Christensen (aviator)", it does NOT direct me to the wikipedia article. The only way I can find the article is if I go to wikipedia and search "Nils Christensen (aviator)". Otherwise it directs me to "Nils Christensen Ringnæs". Why am I not able to find the article in wikipedia by just searching on google (or other search engine)??

I just submitted a "Nils Christensen (disambiguation)" page. Will this solve the problem?

Truthfunbug2 (talk) 03:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Truthfunbug2 Greeting to you and welcome to AfC help desk. The the article has been accepted in AfC, the page need to be accepted in new page review before Google is permitted to index the page. Wikipedia has no control how long Google would take to index the page, but usually it is within 72 hours after the page is accepted in NPP. I have just accept the page in NPP so just wait for a day or two and you should be able to find the page in Google search engine. Thank you very much for your contribution and happy happy New Year. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Eatcha (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

Eatcha (talk) 05:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can any one please check my question at https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Can_I_create_a_page_for_b374k_shell. I wanna create an Article on B374k Webshell.

• Sakura6977 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Sakura6977/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

When I click on view template, an 'empty' redlink opens up.

The template name reflecting is "Nizam" whereas, I want the template to be named as "Nizam of Hyderabad".

Something not right.Please help. Thank you.

Sakura6977 (talk) 05:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06:15:24, 20 December 2018 review of submission by Ia.anunta

• Ia.anunta (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

• MrMohammedJanjua (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sunny Jafry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

MrMohammedJanjua (talk) 07:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Meccoworld (talk · contribs)
  • User:Meccoworld/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Meccoworld (talk) 07:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Locallion (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Corey McVicar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Locallion (talk) 08:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article may need a major help in terms of finding more reliable sources that show his successful part and rearrange the article into paragraph style or bullet so, that can easy to read Locallion (talk) 08:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Raener Lewington (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Raener Lewington (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review of my page as I provided links to my books that I referenced on my page and kept the page simple but informative. I am unsure of what I can do to make the page sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia aside from what has been included. Any form of help or advice I could receive on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Raener Lewington (talk) 08:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• FlippyFlink (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Cardano (platform) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I submitted this article and it was tagged for speedy deletion within one hour and two hours later it was deleted. I contested that speedy deletion on the talk page, but no one reacted. Now I am asking advice on how to proceed. I feel this article meets the notability guideline, but other(s) are not convinced. If possible I want to rewrite the article like other cryptocurrency articles, but having tried that I am asking for additional advice on what I could do to meet the Wikipedia standard. I am not paid or compensated to contribute to this article. I also was not asked to start this article. Information security and crypto are one of my favorite topics. So I created several related pages in the English Wikipedia and Dutch Wikipedia. In this case I wanted to start the former (deleted) article, but someone did it already. So I contributed to that (deleted) page. Before the page was deleted I already started an improvement in my sandbox, but never came around to it to actually do and publish a complete improvement. Now that the page was deleted, I have the chance to create/start a page to my liking. I asked the reddit comunity to contribute also and help with finding some quality content which meet Wikipedia standards. Even the Wikipedia admin David Gerard who moved 'my' newly created article to draft gave me/us some pointers on how to create a qualifying Wikipedia article. That was and is much apreaciated. Please advise on how to proceed.

FlippyFlink (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FlippyFlink, Y Accepted. I liked the draft version you had in your sandbox - I removed the 'Philosophy' and 'Third Generation' sections as I'm unsure they're encyclopedic. However, I felt your sources (Reuters/IBT) merited notability. Please feel free to continue improving it in articlespace -- it's now at Cardano (cryptocurrency). programmingGeek(talk, contribs) 21:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 2405:204:81:13D6:9EFF:E139:D17F:854B (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Plivo Inc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, This draft was submitted more than 3 weeks ago. I will really appreciate it if someone please comes up and reviews it for me. Thanks in advance.

2405:204:81:13D6:9EFF:E139:D17F:854B (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wanderguides (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Visier Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am working on a company page https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Visier_Inc. of which I've failed to pass the significant coverage guidelines. I have included more coverage for the company but want to ensure I don't fail the guidelines again. I've reviewed the WP:SIGCOV page and believe that a number of the articles included do pass the test, however the page continues to fail. Please help, I just want to get an understanding of what still isn't fitting the criteria, as the references have numerous independent sources from outlets like TechCrunch, Venture Beat, etc. that have a primary focus on the company and are not sponsored and totally independent.

Thanks!

Wanderguides (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• KfrostTBC (talk · contribs)

Can you please let me know why my post was deleted when it was not a solicitation as it they were business facts supported by linked cites? KfrostTBC (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 104.173.214.74 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Benjamin Schnau (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello everyone,

I received a message that I should connect all the articles with the sources. I did already on my last change. What are you still asking for.

Pls review the page its all connected.

Thanks in advance 104.173.214.74 (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]