• Mpbrown257 (talk · contribs)
  • Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am wanted to ask why the references did not sure enough notability for the Draft page for Draft:Primordial Radio?

All links are independence of the actual company and actually written about the Radio Station as opposed to the being about the station itself? Also, given the level of investment through Seedrs, there aren't many radio stations that have ever achieved that, so I was wondering how the those bid itself and the numerous 3rd party articles about the equity fund not make the Radio Station noteworthy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpbrown257 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage isn't significant enough. Here, we are supposed to only pass articles if it would pass an articles for deletion nomination in mainspace. The coverage is run of the mill- i.e. coverage most radio stations get, especailly the sources you've added about it starting up. Other sources in the article do not go in depth enough- WP:CORPDEPTH. I understand this might be disappointing- we have quite a high barrier for notability. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Slovo69 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Christopher McCafferty DJ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am not sure how to correctly present citations and references. I would greatly appreciate your advice and guidance. Slovo69Slovo69 (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slovo69 (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slovo69. It appears that you've figured out how to move the citations to immediately after the statement they support, instead of leaving them clustered at the bottom. That's a move in the right direction. If you still have questions in this regard, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the Teahouse, Help Desk, or here. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]