• 4ctmam (talk · contribs)
  • Gizmodrome (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Gizmodrome (album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I created the following article: https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Draft:Gizmodrome_(album) The following statement is in the "review waiting" box: "The page Gizmodrome (album) redirects to Gizmodrome. Please verify that it is not a copy of this submission and that this page does not need to be moved to a different title." How do I do this? "Gizmodrome" is an article about the band of that name, my aricle is about their self-titled debut album. It's pretty self-excplanatory that they are two different things. 4ctmam (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 4ctmam that's not really a problem. When the draft is accepted it will simply replace the current redirect, you don't need to do anything about it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Brixjon (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Firstdub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Draft:Firstdub keeps getting rejected because 'because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia'.

How can i demonstrate this?

Brixjon (talk) 16:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brixjon. Is Firstdub a website? To justify an encyclopedia article about it you would need to show that it meets the notability guideline for websites or the general notability guideline. 4chan, YouTube, Slashdot, Conservapedia, and The Daily Mash are good examples of how editors have demonstrated that other websites meet the inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Blondewolf (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

Hello, I am the president of the National Federation of Press Women (NFPW). Attempting to update list of national Communicator of Achievement winners from 1957 - 2017. The information is posted on our web site nfpw.org as referrence. Please advise if I have done this correctly. It has been some time since I was writing on Wikipedia and need a little help. Blondewolf Blondewolf (talk) 18:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blondewolf. I've left a note on your talk page about how to manage a conflict of interest, in case you never received the notice before, or have forgotten its details.

The list of honorees has been converted to a bulleted list in accordance with our Manual of Style. About half of the blue links on the list make sense (i.e. they're to journalists) but the other half may be links to other people who happen to share the same name. I recommend that you review the links and adjust any that don't lead to the right place. If Helen Waterhouse is not the Helen Waterhouse who was honored in 1963, then change the link to Helen Waterhouse (journalist), or (publisher), or whatever the case may be. If you don't want the parenthetical disambiguator to appear in the rendered text, it can be piped as [[Helen Waterhouse (journalist)|Helen Waterhouse]]. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]