When will my article accept on wikipedia???..--Krishnadahal12 (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission was declined because it was completely unreferenced. See my comment above. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 07:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just wanted to make sure that I submitted this OK. It is my first time and if there are any errors, you can tell me

Lauren — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaurenHefferon (talk • contribs) 10:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's now at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ossian Lindholm and yes it's submitted OK. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am submitting a page about a modality called. Metamorphosis . Another branch of the same modality is already up on WIKi. But it is not the same as ours and ours was the original name and founder The one called metamorphic Technique is by a student of the founder and the founder was not pleased about it altho both have now passed anyway. In view of the number of pages called Metamorphosis about other things do you think we should call our page metamorphosis rstjohn to make it easier to find-if it would be or would it confuse the issue. ???? The founder being Robert St John. Ta Urania 10:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angiel (talk • contribs)

In order to get a page accepted on this subject you would need to much more clearly demonstrate the notability of the subject by reference to multiple examples of significant independent coverage in reliable sources - the need for independence of that coverage is absolutely key - see WP:N --_nonsense ferret 23:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Panther's Cricket Club(PCC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthik06081991 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article hasn't been submitted. It is likely the article will be declined as there appear to be no sources other than your own personal knowledge of the team, and the team don't seem to be playing at proffessional level. Rankersbo (talk) 17:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sir, why my article declined...all the matters in the article are true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayaprasadcherunniyoor (talk • contribs) 12:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We can't just take your word for it, we need reliable sources to back up the facts in articles. Rankersbo (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Sara Stierch,

Hi, Thank you for including my article for revision. But the page you sent:

https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Elsa_Cladera_Encinas_de_Bravo

does not correspond with the one I have saved the 24 November 2013. I have made a lot of improvements in it since the page you have here above. The page I can read in: User Nadezhda Bravo Cladera and the one that one can read in the Internet is not the same that you have. I wonder why?

Nadezhda Bravo Cladera (talk) 18:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to my comments at your separate query below, you need to be editing the page Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Elsa_Cladera_Encinas_de_Bravo directly and not any other copy you may have in your user pages. I hope that is clear --_nonsense ferret 23:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Massive wall of text removed: This isn't the place to post articles. Create them in their own article. Since the article is still in history, I suggest adding that content to Colleges in the United Republic of Tanzania LionMans Account (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I know what I am doing here.

Can you please tell me if my article has been submitted for review?

I am nor sure how those citations work.

Can someone help me?

They can call me or John Regna on (201) 394-5944

Thank you,

Joyce Makinajian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.104.222.165 (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For further information about how to correctly format citations please see WP:CITE. Your article has been correctly submitted for review, however it does not seem as if it would have much chance of acceptance in its current state. Writing articles about people to whom you have a direct connection is not recommended at all. What often happens is that you end up with something that looks like an advert rather than an independent encyclopedia article. In this case there is no indication that the subject of the article meets wikipedia's notability guidelines and none of the citations provided are references to significant independent coverage in reliable sources - you should be thinking along the lines of examples such as particular references to specific detailed newspaper articles on the subject in national newspapers or similar in order to establish notability. Each fact presented must also be verifiable with reference to such reliable sources --_nonsense ferret 23:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]