Hello,

I've received feedback that the following article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric A. Spiegel relies too much on our corporate website for verification. What other sources should I include to verify the content and authenticity? This post is about the CEO of the Siemens AG US subsidiary.

Thanks CRHassettVA4 (talk) 15:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Independent sources - meaning news reports etc (publications with editorial control) written by someone who was not paid or in any other way rewarded by any department, divsion or affiliate of any part of Siemens. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a newby. Is my article still in the queue since I re-edited it to add the 5 references? I can't tell from the way the contribution looks. Jelafi17 (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is correctly submitted for review; as long as there's a yellow "Review waiting" message it will get reviewed. The new references look good to me, but you should add them inline so our readers can tell which source supports which of the draft's statements, not just list them all at the end. Huon (talk) 21:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]