From 3 sources coming from the official website, I already limited its dependent sources into 1. And the rest is all independent sources now. Please check it. Hoping it'll be accepted now. (FilLagCal (talk) 01:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Note: article submission is currently awaiting review. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please help me about providing offline sources available in scanned pdf format, printed books (non ISBN) and news-paper articles.

Regards Avinendra (talk) 06:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:REFB for how to add references. Note that scanning material in order to present it in PDF format is not normally useful; and that books published without ISBNs in the last fifty years are unlikely to be reliable sources. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Help Desk :)

my article has been declined as I am not very good at this yet

http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/User:DianeSunshineCoast/sandbox

I have done research on wikipedia to improve the article and I have added more information - but some of the reference links have gone wonky and I do not know how to fix this. I would really like to resubmit this article for consideration - can anyone give me more feedback on what I need to do next to pass muster and get the article published.

Any help will be most gratefully appreciated.

Best wishes DSC --Diane (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've used ref name cites without having first defined the ref name. Replacing references 4 and 5 with the full citations instead of the short ref name should fix it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dodger67 for the information ... I will have another go

--Diane (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i need help with editing the article i am trying to submit. it seems that i am doing something wrong and would be thankful if it could be edited so that it is no longer unacceptable. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotions Analytics

thank youLanlossos (talk) 08:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Lan Lossos[reply]

I fixed the link in your post - be careful about capital letters and there is no space between the double brackets that create a wikilink. Reviewers have left comments about the style problems and links to further pages where you can get guidance. Your references are also not correct, see the WP:Referencing for beginners guide. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nielsmorling/European DNA Profiling Group - new contribution

Could you please communicate the issues that you find include copyrighted information so that we can exclude this information?

Best wishes,

Niels Morling— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nielsmorling (talk • contribs) 09:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link to the page concerned. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[( Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adrian Harris)] has been rejected due to notability. I have just resubmitted it with more external references. However I notice there are many actors with fewer external references than I have used. What is your criteria for notability? Is it a set number of mentions or over a certain period of time? Thanks! Michelle Meeshharris (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the general notability guideline at WP:GNG; a shorter summary is at WP:42. You are free to work on improving articles about other actors, instead of trying to create an article about Adrian Harris, if you wish. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]