Computing desk | ||
---|---|---|
< July 15 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 17 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
I'm in the process of making my personal website mobile-friendly. I was so glad to find out that adding the "viewport" link was all that was formally required that I just plunged in without much forethought, duplicating files, adding the link to each file, and rearranging the code so it could reasonably be compressed horizontally.
Currently, when html://www.something.com is invoked, control passes to the index.html file. So I should have planned to replace the current index.html with another of the same name. But instead, my new "index" is "arbitrary.html" and I call it with html://www.something.com/arbitrary.html. Unfortunately in each file I also coded a link back to this new home page. There are a couple of hundred files which I would have to edit individually to get it right (that is, link to index.html rather than arbitrary.html).
I did it the wrong way, but the best I could, as an amateur. Is there any way I could save myself through some kind of indirection, so that when "something.com" is entered as the URL, arbitrary.html gets executed? --Halcatalyst (talk) 02:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
DirectoryIndex arbitrary.html
. Tevildo (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)<meta http-equiv="Refresh" content="0; url=arbitrary.html" />
in the <head>
section of index.html. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)In sent items, is the time stamp on outlook, the time the email went into the sent items folder or the time it went to the outbox folder, if it took a while to send because either the file was large or you had connection problems? 92.27.242.127 (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
While I was using MS Word and MS Excel, I realised that:
Apostle (talk) 18:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
What is highly praised in this day and age? Paid/Free? -- Apostle (talk) 18:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)