Wikipedia:Open proxies noticeboard/Inconclusive Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Open_proxies_noticeboard/Inconclusive

OSCAR service open on 5190. Not sure of the significance of this.  Inconclusive —Crazytales talk/desk 15:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Open on 8080, but I get server timeouts.  Inconclusive —Crazytales talk/desk 15:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Running a proxy on 8080, but authentication required.  Inconclusive —Crazytales (t.) 01:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Port 5900 is open (VNC); horrible security practice. I don't have a VNC client at my disposal now though, so I can't say whether it's open or not. —Crazytales (t.) 15:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Whole mess of open ports, but I wasn't able to connect on any. —Crazytales (public computer) ^{(talk) (main)} 16:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Japanese web server; may be someone with access to it. —Crazytales (public computer) ^{(talk) (main)} 16:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive evidence Lots of services running, but all secure. AmiDaniel (talk) 00:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 01:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 01:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive evidence AmiDaniel (talk) 00:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 04:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive evidence AmiDaniel (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 03:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive evidence AmiDaniel (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 21:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive No open ports - host down at time of scan. Suggest scanning again in a day or so. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 02:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 21:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive No open ports - host down at time of scan. Suggest scanning again in a day or so. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 02:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 20:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive No open ports - host down at time of scan. Suggest scanning again in a day or so. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 02:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 05:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive No open ports - host down at time of scan. Suggest scanning again in a day or so. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 02:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 15:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inconclusive evidence -The edits, google hits, and WHOIS (Sound of Hope Radio Network?) do seem suspicious and port 80 appears to be an open HTTP port, however, I have yet to be able to connect through it. Perhaps part of a Botnet? Mr.Z-man 21:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 16:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that this host is now offline or is firewalling my IP address. ClueBot IV's assessment may be wrong. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 16:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C:\Program Files\Nmap>nmap -P0 -A -p 8080 70.89.86.6

Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-10-03 13:04 Eastern Daylight
Time
Warning:  OS detection for 70.89.86.6 will be MUCH less reliable because we did
not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port
Warning:  OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at lea
st 1 open and 1 closed TCP port
Interesting ports on 70-89-86-6-smc-jax-fl.hfc.comcastbusiness.net (70.89.86.6):

PORT     STATE    SERVICE    VERSION
8080/tcp filtered http-proxy
Device type: switch|broadband router|printer|load balancer|general purpose|route
r
Running: Bay Networks embedded, Billion embedded, Canon embedded, Cisco embedded
, Linux 2.4.X|2.6.X, Microsoft Windows 2003/.NET|NT/2K/XP, RiverStone embedded,
Sun Solaris 8
Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details

OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http:
//insecure.org/nmap/submit/ .
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.387 seconds

Inconclusive evidence If it was an open proxy it's closed/filtered now. Mr.Z-man 17:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxy It's open now (blocked). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 10:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 18:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive (blocked) -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 00:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive (blocked) -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 08:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive (blocked) -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV 04:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive (blocked) -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive I'd already blocked this as a XRumer proxy. Port 8888 is open, others are filtered. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 23:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive port 8000 appears open but I can't connect through it. Seems to be an exploited webserver or private proxy. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anonymizer proxies are usually undetectable by portscans, per personal experience. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive — No open ports. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 17:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anonymizer proxies are usually undetectable by portscans, per personal experience. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anonymizer proxies are usually undetectable by portscans, per personal experience. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anonymizer proxies are usually undetectable by portscans, per personal experience. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anonymizer proxies are usually undetectable by portscans, per personal experience. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anonymizer proxies are usually undetectable by portscans, per personal experience. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 08:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 02:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 08:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive No longer on the list, though could be Tor back on Jan 9. --WinHunter ^(talk) 00:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 05:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 05:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 14:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 14:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host up, has HTTP-proxy on port 80, but I'm unable to connect through it. Mr.Z-man 01:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. FWIW, the Portuguese Wikipedia blocked this IP as a proxy ([4]). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a default installation of the Apache web server. It's highly likely that the server has been exploited to be used as a proxy. A portscan reveals several ports open, but all the ports return to the Apache default installation page. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 21:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - No open proxy found, likely hacked though. Recommend block. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxy - I found a CGI proxy here. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 01:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Though, user is from Korea. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Not an open proxy, but might be a trojan. Host is a Windows computer. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 15:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Not a proxy, but there is a VNC server running on that computer. I am not going to try to brute force it, though. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - There is a remote management console running over telnet on port 23, however, I tried a few default usernames/passwords, but none of them worked. It may have been brute forced, though. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 19:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 19:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Host is down. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 19:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 04:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - CISCO router, though I don't see any signs of it being a proxy. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 23:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - AHBL claims is TOR, Kewlio says no, ClueBot IV says no. Leaning toward Not an open proxy Calvin 1998 ^Talk _Contribs 23:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 23:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Kewlio=No TOR, Sectoor=Subnet is TOR, AHBL TORbl=No TOR. Calvin 1998 ^Talk _Contribs 00:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 21:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive. No open ports, but zombie computers can evade portscans. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 23:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive requires authentication. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxy TOR Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 04:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, purports to block access to Wikipedia on 66.230.200.100 and 66.230.200.219. Does anyone know all the IPs? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 00:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - subnet is TOR, and you can't block only a subnet. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 01:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - appears maybe to be open on HTTP port 80. Another portscan would be nice. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 17:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a router. Port 80 requires a username and password, so no go there. I'm not seeing any proxies at the moment. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 21:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive- I couldn't connect to ports 80, 8080, 3128, and 6667. Can someone run a portscan on this IP, and re-check it? I can't find any proxies on it myself, but that doesn't mean there aren't any. I Googled the IP, and it came up on proxy lists for port 8080- maybe the host is down right now? Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 21:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive- I couldn't connect to ports 80, 8080, 3128, and 6667. Can someone run a portscan on this IP, and re-check it? I can't find any proxies on it myself, but that doesn't mean there aren't any. I Googled the IP, and it came up on proxy lists for port 8080- maybe the host is down right now? Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 21:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - TOR checks come up negative. Needs further testing. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 18:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - ClueBot checked SECTOOR, but I just followed the link and it's not listed, so someone with Tor should check this one. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 17:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - ClueBot checked SECTOOR, but I just followed the link and it's not listed, so someone with Tor should check this one. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 17:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - TOR checks come up negative. Needs further testing. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 18:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reposted after being archived by ClueBot IV. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 06:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - ClueBot checked SECTOOR, but I just followed the link and it's not listed, so someone with Tor should check this one. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 17:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 09:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive TOR check shows nothing, further investigation needed. Soxred93 | talk bot 05:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 11:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive TOR check comes up negative, further investigation needed. Soxred93 | talk bot 15:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Was Tor when it was reported and ClueBot IV checked. Not Tor when I checked, though. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 03:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive - Was Tor when it was reported and ClueBot IV checked. Not Tor when I checked, though. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 03:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive The refdesk spammer uses open proxies, and this was one. It's an exit IP which appears to change every day or two within a small range - currently exits on 203.162.3.159, entry at 203.162.163.78:80 and 203.162.163.80:80. Probably worth blocking for a month or three but likely to cause collateral. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, was an open proxy, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, was an open proxy, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, was an open proxy exit, dynamic IP, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, was an open proxy, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 22:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive port 3128 was an open proxy, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, was an open proxy, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive port 8080 was an open proxy, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ran a portscan myself, and http port 8080 seems to be open.

8080/tcp  open   http-proxy

I then attempted connecting through it in Firefox, but it seems to be down. Can someone investigate? Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 06:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the links in the scan report, and I see that this IP is listed on at least 3 blacklist sites: NAJBL, NoMoreFunn, and spamhaus.org (XBL). Does that situation have any relationship to the apparent ability of a North American user to use this Chinese IP? Orlady (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though I know little about open proxies, the 2,710 Google results for this address, plus the mentions of spam, suggest some notoriety. EdJohnston (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nmap shows it's open HTTP port 80, but I tried to connect to the Internet via this IP and I get a blocked message in Chinese. I don't think this proxy works... Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 21:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive was an open proxy port 8080, seems to be down now. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first link in the scan report, NJABL, indicates that this IP is listed as an open proxy. Does that have any relevance to Wikipedia's determination? Orlady (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Nmap returns all ports "filtered", but I get a timeout error when attempting to use HTTP port 80 on this IP. Someone else check this one. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 21:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, no ports open, looks like an exit IP for an open proxy. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same result as above. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 21:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive, no ports open, looks like an exit IP for an open proxy. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Report page has been deleted. ClueBot IV (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At first, I thought it was from one of these sites, but they lead to a different IP. Spellcast (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to do a nmap scan on this but the ports were filtered so I can't say this is an open proxy. --Kanonkas :  Talk  21:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive The same with me. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:44, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive I can connect, but it's not sending any pages through. Xclamation point 20:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Formerly an open proxy, but it is refusing connections now. 209.222.133.187/28 is a whole range of proxies, but they al are resuzing connections. Xclamation point 22:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Formerly an open proxy, but it is refusing connections now. Xclamation point 22:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Only thing open was an Apple VNC port, somebody might test that. Q ^{T C} 01:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not an open proxy. No HTTP proxy and the edit doesn't match an open VNC either. These are usually school IPs btw. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 10:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]