Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Help:Interlanguage links/Dutch Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Help:Interlanguage_links/Dutch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was mark historical. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Interlanguage links/Dutch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extremely outdated and confusing page. This method of soliciting Interlanguage is no longer being done. Keizers (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Mark as historical, was once useful. Graham87 07:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Mark as above. Most of the Help:Interlanguage links/X pages are marked as historical. Could I ask if Help:Interlanguage links is still a useful tool or not? Is that also historical? Achowat (talk) 14:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Interlanguage links are used as frequently as ever, so that help page is undoubtedly useful. Graham87 09:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment "In the spirit of international cooperation"! Diplomacy through wiki! ~Crazytales (talk) 02:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as historical Ten-year-old project pages are important for documenting our history, especially as most people active then are no longer around and thus don't contribute to the institutional memory. Nyttend (talk) 18:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.