![]() | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Link rot. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Looks like Wizards of the Coast pulled all Unearthed Arcana articles (https://dnd.wizards.com/articles/unearthed-arcana) articles from before 2020 (ex: Waterborne Adventures (2015), Psionics and the Mystic – Take Two (2016), Dragonmarks (2018), etc). I started to manually update this at List of Dungeons & Dragons rulebooks#Unearthed Arcana (since it seems all of them have been archived) but it's a lot of articles and I'm not sure what other Wikipedia articles use the UA articles as sources. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 20:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
It's only in 9 articles:
Can/should archive links be added to sources from Twitter which don't already have them via a bot? Media coverage on the company is showing it is increasingly unstable and I'm a bit concerned about the potential future link rot. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
At some point the website revamped itself, but the old links don't redirect to the new ones. This is an old link, and this is the new one. If the bot can't replace the links (I don't expect it to), can it add archives to the dead ones or at least tag the existing links as dead? Kailash29792 (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
{{dead link}}
. -- GreenC 21:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Details in this Mastodon post. The four deprecated hosts are:
In all cases, the hosts should be changed to www.bbc.co.uk or www.bbc.com (see post). Is it possible to easily get the scale of the problem? I don't know the Wikipedia linkrot tools well enough to know if it's possible to search comprehensively for URLs matching a pattern. — ʞɔıu 14:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)