Not a job, but this: can someone give a link to this mw:page? There is a wiki extension that does: "mouse-position on an image = wikilink"? Just a mw:page would be OK. I remember it is documented greatly. -DePiep (talk) 02:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please improve these photos. The shade guide would ideally be the same size by cropping, and the lighting conditions better too. Many thanks if you can help -- Matthew Ferguson (talk) 09:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just hoping for a little lossless cropping. Please draw a line between the two houses and upload each half separately. A line that cuts the red car in half would probably work well, since the building behind it is a garage that doesn't matter. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to clear the image, removing the man visible in the background and maybe even the shoulder in the foreground? This is Thompson's lead image so it would be great to see it improved. -- Loeba(talk)11:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done This is the best I can do with it. If someone can do better, please go ahead. I've cleaned it up as much as I can and saved as much detail as was possible using the filter. Carl Henderson (talk) 01:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I requested undeletion of old revisions of the file. However, administrators refused for copyright concerns. Actually, I recently changed my preference to "400px" for many images. The image looks too small for anyone preferring to see a larger scale of the image. The same could not be said, however, for everyone else being fine with the image as is. The image went alterations before size reduction, an improvement from original version of the image. How do you do the same alterations as the current image with a larger scale? -- George Ho (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done However the article is protected and will not allow me to upload a new version under the same file name, so please note the new name "Malcolm Turnbull 2014 Blotch Removed.jpg" of my upload. You will have to get it updated on the protected page, if that is desired.Carl Henderson (talk) 03:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a much better scan for base material, thank you! Can the background be lightened slightly so his hair and shoulders have some contrast, is what I mean.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like some details were lost in that line at the bottom. The text in the image is also not perfectly horizontal. The final S in SCAVANS is also located a few pixels higher than the initial S. But in general, Hohum's version looks pretty good. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books}16:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done I removed one side of the black bar. I could remove the top, but it would take a lot of work, and likely wouldn't look very good. I think this removes the impression of a frame. Let me know what you think. MjolnirPantsTell me all about it.18:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]