This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Graphics Lab, for the period 2020. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.
This is a bit of an involved request (it's actually a two part request), but perhaps someone is willing to take a shot at doing it. There are currently eternal links to individual district maps embedded into the table in New York City Council#Districts. I'm wondering if anyone can figure a way to (1) create a map for all of the districts as a whole (like used File:Chicago City Council Wards.svg in Chicago City Council) and (2) individual maps for each district like the ones used in Los Angeles City Council. A general map for New York City's districts can be seen here; so, maybe there's a way to work from that to the aforementioned maps. It's a big task that probably will take some time, but I'm just curious if it's feasible. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: On the first part, I will draft a map of the 51 council districts. The georeferenced data on district boundaries is open data. The second part of creating 51 individual maps is feasible. Let me think about creating a script for this. I'll get back to you in a few days. - DutchTreat (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: Completed the complete map of all 51 districts. See the image above. This image can be used to highlight each district via zoom and crop as shown on the pages: District 1 (New York City Council) and District 51 (New York City Council). These technical allows for one basemap that can be updated which will automatically be applied to each district page. FOr putting all 51 maps on the same page, not sure of the performance impact. Please share your thoughts on this approach. - DutchTreat (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for doing that DutchTreat. Is it possible to use zoom for the individual district entires in the "New York City Council" article? If that can work, then individual images would probably not be necessary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Marchjuly Functionly, no problem with referring to the same basemap image 51 times, once for each district. Since the basemap is large (>2 MiB), not sure if the performance penalty. I'll set up a sample page in my user-space and run a test. Will get back to you in a few days. Thanks for the feedback. - DutchTreat (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Marchjuly Completed my work on the 51 district maps using {{maplink}}. See the User:DutchTreat/Projects/Maps/nyc-council-districts. Each dstrict is defined as a Data map object in Commons. Then maplink template used on WP references each map file to draw an interactive map for the council boundaries. I like this approach best since the street level map is shown as a tile background and the map is zoomable for detailed viewing. Please give me any feedback if you would like any changes. If no issue with this approach, go ahead and use them. - DutchTreat (talk) 11:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Marchjuly I think you already know the answer, but want to close the loop. Yes, simple copy/paste should work. Please add {{resolved}} if no further work is needed from your original request. - DutchTreat (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I figured it out. Anything that still needs to be sorted out can be done on the article's talk page. Thanks again for all your help. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi folks - I put an initial query up, probably in the wrong place, about 3 years ago, here. I would like to improve the New Zealand wine article with a decent map of the geographical indications. As you can see, I've made a somewhat amateurish attempt at it myself, but I am by no means an expert at cartography or indeed computer graphics in general. Source satellite map images (and ESRI shape data files) for the exact boundaries of each GI region can be found at the the IPONZ GI register - for instance, for Auckland. Any help appreciated. — Jon (talk) 04:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Done—please let me know if you want any changes, they are easily done. The regions are all now registered, so the key is not needed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 12:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi - looks great, thank you! Just a few small things: 1. Gisborne is spelled without the "u"; 2. can we link the two zoomed-in areas to a box outline on the main map, and 3. it's not clear that Central Hawke's Bay is a subregion of Hawke's Bay, similarly North Canterbury and the larger Canterbury region. – Jon (talk) 12:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
! & 2 done, but not 3, as there are no sub-regions. Your comment seems to assume the regional boundaries are included in the map, and they aren't (except when a geographical indicator boundary happens to run along a regional boundary). Canterbury is good example of this. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the updates. I'm not sure what you mean regarding sub-regions, though. The New Zealand GI Register clearly states (per your example) that Canterbury "has 2 local Geographical Indications within it" and the Canterbury page states that "Canterbury has two geographical indication that are wholly or partly within its area" namely North Canterbury and Waipara. I was attempting to indicate this on the original map by using coloured borders, and smaller font for the sub-regions.— Jon (talk) 20:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
OK, but look at a map of Canterbury (A) and compare it with the wine regions 'Canterbury' (B) and 'North Canterbury' (C), they're not the same, i.e. B+C does not equal A. If you want me to add the NZ regions so that differences can be seen, I can do it for you. :) Amitchell125 (talk) 23:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, forgive me, I'm still not sure what you mean. Here are the maps for the Canterbury and North Canterbury GIs, which show that the North Canterbury GI is simply the northern half of the Canterbury GI, north of the Rakaia River. To clarify, we only want the wine region GI areas on the map, not the administrative regions of New Zealand, even though some of them have the same boundaries (e.g. Hawke's Bay, Gisborne). Moreover, the very northern-most part of the Canterbury region (Kaikoura) is part of the Marlborough GI, not the Canterbury GI. Let me know if I'm not making sense?? —Jon (talk) 06:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I think we should introduce a new colour for the map for countries where the law varies by state, such as the U.S. (perhaps orange). In the U.S. psilocybin mushrooms are not illegal in every state; for example, in Oregon they along with all other drugs have been decriminalised and are legal in the state for medical use in supervised settings. Helper201 (talk) 05:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Discussion
World Map of nations Requirement of president to be natural-born citizen
Hi i am just wondering can somebody make a World Map of nations where the Requirement of president is to be natural-born citizen. the following nations have this law.
1. Mexico
2. Indonesia
3. Philippines
4. Burma
5. Brazil
6. USA
7. Uruguay
8. Argentina
9. Chile
10. Honduras
Wow thanks for the fast reply Amitchell125, i have found a couple more nations that have this requirement for president. if you could update this imfo onto the map that would be very much very much appreciated. thanks again Amitchell125 or anybody else.La lopi (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
11. Kenya
12. Nigeria
13. Venezuela
14. Colombia
15. Costa Rica
16. Peru
17. Guyana
18. Liberia
19. Uruguay
20. Albania
21. Syria
22. Belarus
thanks again. La lopi (talk) 09:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
The small lines going east from Samsun, the 2 white circles and the words "Samsun Gewerbegerbeit" and "Çarşamba" need to be deleted as those lines are no longer used. Would that be easy for one of you guys? If so let me know before you do it and I will check all the station names to see if any need correcting.
Chidgk1, there is no issue to fix this map. I made it, the other are only responsible for the background. Please check the station names, the I'll do the fix in one go.----Pechristener (talk) 18:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Pechristener Thanks for speedy reply. Kavak and Çeltek are missing according to the official map and I cannot see the ğ which should be in Kızoğlu - it looks like a g (although it is hard to see so I may be wrong). Yapı has been erroneously dotted. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I wonder if someone could help with a simple line diagram similar to this map on the Transport for London website? You could also trace the GIS map if a geographical map would be easier to do! I'm thinking something like this, but using the Bakerloo line colours and the TfL style (interchange blobs etc). Do let me know! Turini2 (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
This map is outdated. The Pirate Party UK dissolved in November 2020 and the country now has no registered or active pirate party so its colour on the map needs to be changed. The map may require other updates but this is one I have identified. If someone could please update the UK to the correct colour it would very much be appreciated. Helper201 (talk) 23:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi i am just wondering can sombody make a US map of states which Ban fracking.
1. Vermont banned it in 2012
2. Maryland banned it in 2017
3. Washington banned it in 2019
4. New York bans it as well.
Thanks. La lopi (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
A map of U.S. states colored by their policy on sanctuary cities. States colored in Red have banned sanctuary cities statewide. States highlighted in Blue are pro-sanctuary states, whereas States colored Gray are unknown to be either a pro- or anti- sanctuary state.
The party noted as Brexit on the graph should be re-named to Reform, as the Brexit Party is now Reform UK, as is reflected in the list of parties in the first article and in each key for each of the two graphs in the opinion polling article. Helper201 (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello @PinkPanda272: & @Helper201:, apologies for the delay. I have updated the opinion poll graphs with the most recent results. As requested I have changed the Brexit Party name and added the new Scottish parties. Humongous125 (talk) 12:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi PinkPanda272 yes I can update the graphs during the campaign. (I had stopped updating as I misplaced the file.) Sure, it is looking busy now. I think it looked okay when there was only a few polls a month but having thought about it the switcher is probably more appropriate now. Humongous125 (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
As was pointed out at Talk:Matanuska-Susitna Valley this map is basically useless to anyone with color blindness, and not much better for those who do not have it. It is unfortunately in use in quite a number of different projects, simply because it is the only map we have. I'm not sure how the original creator of the map made the decision to place the borders where they did, the Matanuska part of the valley extends all the way to Matanuska Glacier. I will endeavor to locate some sources that define the valley borders. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
This tweet [6] shows a very different map. (and also points out that they are really two valleys, and it's just a cultural/political thing that they are referred to as one thing.) Beeblebrox (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
The colours are looking great but will be good if you can upload an another map in white only. Thank you so much ✌️. 👤Raju💌03:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Sorry Sir! There is a mistake. In geo-code section 102, you have coloured subsection 01, 02, 03 in one colour and 04 to 10 in another colour. All subsection should be one colour because they are part of one district. Thanks 👤Raju💌03:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
טיוליק It would help us graphic workers if you used the "New request" link at the top of this page. You will find it in the green filed. When you use that link the request will follow the same standard as the rest so it will be easier for us to see, understand and be able to work with them, thanks.
I'm considering to take this request but I will wait for you to get back here as I always want the support of the requester to be able to create as good work as possible, you have the knowledge of this subject, not me. Please always ping me, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)