The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose on procedural grounds. The nominator requested speedy renaming of target category to Category:Ecclesiastical awards, after merging without discussion the two eponymous articles. I think the nominator should state their case of what consistent target structure they have in their mind, because I cannot make sense of these separate actions. At first glance, not all Christian awards are decorations, and not all these awards are ecclesiastical. Place Clichy (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Arkansas is not near a coastline, so it is not possible for there to be a populated coastal place in that state. Archer1234 (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Location of Arkansas in red. Note that Arkansas is not adjacent to a coastline.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The profession of teamster is separate from the trade union that this category is limited to cover. The scope of this category is limited to the International Brotherhood of Teamsters organization and those connected to it. TM13:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Being the son/daughter of a champion racehorse is not a defining characteristic in and of itself and does not make an article subject any more notable. It is not uncommon for male champion racehorses to have hundreds of foals, if not over 1,000. Also, this category appears to have not been updated in several years. If it were up to date, it would be overly broad to the point where most notable racehorses would be in it, since most sires of notable horses "won at least one really big race." In fact, it would be somewhat difficult to find any notable horses that didn't have a parent that "won at least one really big race." Aspening (talk) 04:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.