Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 20 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_20

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:People from Forsyth County, North Carolina. Note that the one article is already in Category:Softball players from North Carolina, so there is no need for a dual merge. (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 21:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Sportspeople from Walkertown, North Carolina

Nominator's rationale: Has only one entry. The parent category for a merge, People from Walkertown, North Carolina, has only entry too, the same article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Upmerge to "People from" and "Sportspeople from NC". Thisn is far too specific and unlikely ever to get well-populated. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:American twin actresses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  
• Propose deleting Category:Female American identical twins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  
• Propose deleting Category:Identical twin child actresses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  
• Propose deleting Category:American identical twin child actresses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Only 1 article at the base of these categories. Rathfelder (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See this earlier discussion of a similar issue. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Category:Polish identical twins.Rathfelder (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support in principle, per WP:SMALLCAT and WP:NARROWCAT. However merge to Category:American twins and Category:Identical twin actresses. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Marcocapelle's suggestion. Dimadick (talk) 05:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• The article is already in Category:Twin people from the United States and Category:Identical twin actresses, so nothing needs merging. Rathfelder (talk) 19:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok thanks, I overlooked that. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• DElete since there is nothing that needs to be upmerged. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 10:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Female Americans to Category:American women‎

Nominator's rationale: Hard to see a distinction. Rathfelder (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - If all of the articles were about adult females, aka "women", I'd support. But I just added Category:American child actresses -- and there should also be a female subcat of Category:American child singers. Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - subcat of Category:Women‎, which includes girls. Oculi (talk) 09:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, it will become too subjective where to draw to the line between adult women and girls. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support A woman is a human female, regardless of age. Dimadick (talk) 05:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• We dont have categories for any other sort of female humans by nationality. Rathfelder (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:United States government images. (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:United States Department of Homeland Security images (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Category completely reliant on {{PD-USGov-DHS}}, now deleted. It has no members, and one subcategory that can be made a direct subcategory of Category:United States government images. Wikiacc (¶) 01:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Tricolour Citizens' Movement. MER-C 08:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Civic Movement – Tricolour to Category:Tricolour (political movement) or Category:Tricolour Citizens' Movement
  

Nominator's rationale: Name of category is incorrect. The main article is Tricolour (political movement) which uses different name so the category should be Tricolour (political movement) or Tricolour Citizens' Movement.--Bedivere.cs (talk) 12:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename -- I would suggest Category:Tricolour Citizens' Movement to match the translation of the full name. This appears to be a rather small political party though involving some prominent politicians. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename to Category:Tricolour Citizens' Movement per Peterkingiron, and revert the bold move of the article on 10 June. This is not even a political movement, it is a political party. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.