The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Created by banned User:Look2See1. Category:Species by IUCN Red List category subcats are already populated and updated automatically based on taxobox status and status_system. Category appears to be populated by species that are rated least concern globally on the IUCN and also occur in California.
An organism that is considered least concern globally by the IUCN may or may not be considered least concern within California specifically. For species that also occur outside California (non-endemics), to make the judgment that the IUCN status also applies to California specifically would likely be WP:OR.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. I don't think the sole member Assumption University (Thailand) should be categorised under either target. It's affiliated with the church, but not such a way that makes Christianity in Thailand or Religion in Bangkok one of its defining characteristics. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The category was created in conjunction with Template:Husbands of British princesses. That template was deleted following discussion here. The conclusion of that discussion was being a husband of a British princess was an appropriate classification, as such individuals don't acquire titles or precedence as a result. This category seems to suffer from the same issue as the template. 2601:241:300:C930:1D8E:D402:BEEA:D579 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.