mic_none

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 15 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_15

< September 14 September 16 >

September 15

[edit]

Category:United States regional rail systems

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Commuter rail in the United States. ℯxplicit 01:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Some time ago Wikipedia recognized that regional rail and commuter rail are not the same thing, the regional rail article specifically specifies that "regional rail" is pretty much not a thing in the US, the systems in Category:United States regional rail systems are commuter rail systems, and the proposed name follows the general pattern of Category:X-thing in X-location. Lost on  Belmont  3200N1000W  (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Non-profit organizations based in Ontario by city

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 22#Category:Non-profit organizations based in Ontario by city

Baseball families subcategories

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 01:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These are all underpopulated and pointless, these articles are already interlinked easily and there is not need for them.★Trekker (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lewis

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename C2D. Timrollpickering 13:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: At Talk:Isle of Lewis#Requested move 18 July 2018 the place in Scotland was moved from Lewis to Isle of Lewis as requested by me. The common name appears to be "Isle of Lewis" with "Lewis" being used locally (on local maps). The name was disputed and although there was consensus to move, there was no consensus on if "Isle of Lewis" is the best name, which is why WP:C2D probably doesn't apply. There is Category:Lewis, Vermont so the old title should become a {{Category ambiguous}}. Even if "Isle of Lewis" isn't its most common name then WP:NATURAL would appear to apply, similar to Isle of Bute/Category:Isle of Bute. With the 2nd and 4th maybe they should be "on the Isle of Lewis" instead. The 3rd is already comma disambiguated, but should be moved to the full "Isle of..." per my reasoning. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Monster Strike

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 01:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is no need for a category that has only two entries. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.