| < February 7 | February 9 > |
|---|
The result of the debate was merge. —akghetto talk 07:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of Category:Fictional characters, and it's sub-cats. Of the sub-cats of Category:Characters, two are otherwise well categorized, and the other two are empty. I've opened up dialog with the creator about the two empty ones on the possibility of them being turned into sub-cats for Category:Characters in written fiction, so I'm not nominating them for deletion at this time, just the duplicative parent category. - TexasAndroid 21:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. —akghetto talk 07:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Modern" is too vague for identifying the era of missiles. I intend the category to include all missiles still in service. Similar renaming recommendations would apply to all subcategories. GCarty 20:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 07:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
With Category:LGBT murderers and Category:LGBT serial killers now gone, this category is empty. Technically I could wait a couple of days and toss it up for speedy deletion, but given the controversial nature of the whole set. I feel it should go through normal channels. - TexasAndroid 19:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. —akghetto talk 07:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting, as this proposal failed to establish consensus, but it is felt that this is due to it running out of time; all of the issues raised in the previous discussion have been addressed, I believe.
The proposed new category covers the whole subject of endemism in birds, not just endemic birds themselves, hence the name is more appropriate. A subcategory exists for restricted-range endemic birds, and one could be set up for non-RR endemics if anyone wishes to, so there is no longer a reason to keep the current name, in my opinion. SP-KP 19:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. —akghetto talk 07:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate is delete --Latinus (talk (el:)) 23:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category is superfluous; it is already a list:List of celebrities on The Simpsons. Similiar category attempts in the past have been deleted. MakeRocketGoNow 17:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. —akghetto talk 07:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename for greater clarity and accuracy (I had already created the new cat before reading the deletion rules through - apologies). Staffelde 14:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of Category:Children's rights, now empty. User:Lucinor 13:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 14:03, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To distinguish between men's and women's basketball players — Bellhalla 08:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 14:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To distinguish between men's and women's basketball team — Bellhalla 08:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 14:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Team has not been known by "Lady Longhorns" moniker for several years. — Bellhalla 08:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 14:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Team has not been known by "Lady Longhorns" moniker for several years. — Bellhalla 08:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 07:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A duplicate of Category:Jewish American writers, created in error and now empty.--ThreeAnswers 07:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 07:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:International New Zealand Actors was apparently created by someone unfamiliar with the method of populating categories; there is a list of actors on the page, but the only article actually assigned to the category is a television series. Delete; there is nothing to merge. There is already a properly created Category:New Zealand actors. Metropolitan90 05:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep Category:Slovak law per naming convention --Kbdank71 14:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is already a Category:Slovak law.
Rename to Category:Law of Sloavkia, per Septentrionalis Carlossuarez46 20:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 14:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
These categories have all had corresponding women’s categories made for them under Category:College basketball players. These are thus now inaccurate, since not all of the basketball players from those schools are in them. So adding “men’s” seems appropriate. Note these are only the schools where articles exist for both men and women, and where the men’s and women’s team names match exactly. (So, for example, Georgia is not here because the men are Bulldogs and the women are Lady Bulldogs.) So these categories are suggested for renaming:
--Mike Selinker 00:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: Added all men's programs where women's programs are the same name, even if no women's categories yet exist. (Specifically not Arkansas, Oklahoma State, UNLV and UTEP.)
--Mike Selinker 17:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was not sure what the nomination is, nothing done --Kbdank71 14:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is another school with different nicknames for men and women. I just hopped on to their official athletics site (usctrojans.collegesports.com) and found that my longtime memory was right—"Trojans" is specific to men's teams. Women's athletes are officially known as "Women of Troy". I've just slapped CFRs on all of the categories for basketball at that school. — Dale Arnett 04:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 07:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This kind of information belongs in the Star Wars article. JW 00:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]