Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xylem Learning Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xylem_Learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 00:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xylem Learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not meet WP:NCORP requirements. The sources are merely press releases and therefore, not independent as they fit the description listed at WP:NEWSORGINDIA and they do not provide the stringent sourcing required to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The rest of the coverage is WP:ROUTINE due to physicswallah investing in the company. - Ratnahastin (talk) 01:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 01:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to resolve it United Blasters (talk) 01:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Technology, and Kerala. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Requesting you to not to delete the article. And inviting more editors. United Blasters (talk) 05:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, and noting that this topic was declined at Draft:Xylem less than two months ago. The new mainspace attempt is word-for-word that older draftspace article, though then with additions, suggesting they are both based on an uncited original (which usually means COI) or one is based on the other without credit (which often means SOCK). DMacks (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.